Breaking News
May 20, 2018 - Developmental psychotherapy aims at helping antisocial adolescents become responsible adults
May 20, 2018 - People with OCD process emotions differently than their unaffected siblings
May 20, 2018 - Interfering with enzyme’s movement may be new approach for developing of anti-cancer drugs
May 20, 2018 - Prestroke and poststroke oral anticoagulation therapy in AF patients
May 20, 2018 - Why drug users prefer heroin at home, but cocaine while out
May 20, 2018 - Gene therapy that reverses blindness in dogs could also help treat humans
May 20, 2018 - Opioid-Related Payments Linked to Increase in Opioid Rx
May 20, 2018 - Phone apps push people to take their pills
May 20, 2018 - Backbreaking Work May Shorten Men’s Lives
May 20, 2018 - Harsher drug laws won’t stop violence, argues former police chief
May 20, 2018 - Cognitive decline in dementia is not reduced by exercise
May 20, 2018 - Detecting breast cancer with non-invasive ‘disease screening pill’
May 20, 2018 - Simple treatment may minimize hearing loss triggered by loud noises
May 20, 2018 - Alignment of mother and offspring body clock could prevent diseases such as heart disease and obesity
May 20, 2018 - New commercial data warehouse for life sciences
May 20, 2018 - Practice Intervention Targeting IV Opioids May Cut Exposure
May 20, 2018 - New study provides insight into blood signatures of inflammation
May 20, 2018 - Scientists make breakthrough discovery about vitamin B12
May 20, 2018 - What Causes Cancer? Misconceptions Abound
May 20, 2018 - Proper burial of dead cells limits inflammation
May 20, 2018 - Study offers novel solution to suppress metastatic spread of deadly breast cancer
May 20, 2018 - Perspectives of patients and caregivers on care transitions
May 20, 2018 - Guidelines for weight gain in pregnancy should be changed for underweight and very obese women
May 20, 2018 - Researchers transplant retinal sheets derived from human embryonic stem cells in retinal degeneration mouse models
May 20, 2018 - U.S. military personnel at greater risk for skin cancer than general population
May 20, 2018 - Your immune system holds the line against repeat invaders, thanks to this molecule
May 20, 2018 - Between death and deportation
May 20, 2018 - Developing a High Throughput Mass Spectrometry Platform for Drug Discovery
May 19, 2018 - New project aims to increase awareness among hospital clinicians of non-beneficial treatment at end-of-life
May 19, 2018 - Automated bone scan index offers accurate, speedy prognostic information about prostate cancer
May 19, 2018 - Rutgers Cancer Institute nurses research various topics to enhance patient experience
May 19, 2018 - Computer models provide valuable insight to structure and function of Ebola, Zika viruses
May 19, 2018 - Study exposes key tactic used by deadly fungus
May 19, 2018 - Bacterial signals are crucial to development of pre-leukemic myeloproliferation, study shows
May 19, 2018 - Global experts identify key issues in supporting children with brain injuries transition back to school
May 19, 2018 - Social connections may protect black men who have sex with men from acquiring HIV
May 19, 2018 - Study IDs Factors Linked to Quality of Life With Dementia
May 19, 2018 - Potassium — Consumer
May 19, 2018 - HIV-1 viruses transmitted at birth are resistant to antibodies in mother’s blood
May 19, 2018 - Some water pitchers are much better at removing toxins, shows research
May 19, 2018 - Scientists discover how unusually long strands of RNA help colon cancer cells avoid death
May 19, 2018 - International study finds viable treatment option for people with mild asthma
May 19, 2018 - Mayo discovery could enable development of personalized ovarian, brain cancer treatments
May 19, 2018 - ‘Superbug’ Surfaces at Poultry Farm in China
May 19, 2018 - UCLA-designed program helps former HIV-positive inmates maintain health after release from jail
May 19, 2018 - New blood test could help avoid more than 40% of prostate biopsies, study finds
May 19, 2018 - Macrophages play key role in maintaining stem cell niche of mammary gland
May 19, 2018 - Ferritin Blood Test: MedlinePlus Lab Test Information
May 19, 2018 - Prolonged exposure to air pollution leads to genetic changes in rat brains, study finds
May 19, 2018 - Scientists identify new potential target to combat acute myeloid leukemia
May 19, 2018 - Ovarian cancer therapy may help treat patients with aggressive pancreatic cancer
May 19, 2018 - MediciNova Announces Opening of Investigational New Drug Application for MN-166 (ibudilast) in Glioblastoma
May 19, 2018 - Research shows that sexual activity and emotional closeness are unrelated to the rate of cognitive decline
May 19, 2018 - Nuffield Council on Bioethics outlines ethical issues arising from use of AI in healthcare
May 19, 2018 - Pancreatic cancer patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations fare better on platinum-based chemotherapy
May 19, 2018 - Tradeshow Talks with nal von minden Ltd
May 19, 2018 - Chemist begins new project to develop carbohydrate mimics to assist cancer therapies
May 19, 2018 - Healthy Lifestyle for Healthy Older Adults
May 19, 2018 - Epstein-Barr virus linked to seven serious diseases
May 19, 2018 - Biochemists isolate protein supercomplex from bacteria that generates voltage
May 19, 2018 - Mindfulness-based Stress Management Course for cancer survivors
May 19, 2018 - Simple screening tool can help identify people at increased risk for dementia
May 19, 2018 - Many gay and bisexual teenage boys use adult hookup apps to connect with friends, partners
May 19, 2018 - Maternal Exposure to Polluted Air Tied to Elevated Child BP
May 19, 2018 - Experimental drug extends survival in progeria
May 19, 2018 - FutureNeuro and GreenLight Medicines team up to develop cannabis-based treatments for epilepsies
May 19, 2018 - Brazilians with less education more likely to perceive as being in poor health
May 19, 2018 - Experts available to discuss subjects related to Ebola virus
May 19, 2018 - Opioid Makers’ Perks to Docs Tied to More Prescriptions
May 19, 2018 - AI detects patterns of gut microbes for cholera risk
May 19, 2018 - Researcher develops small molecules that inhibit derailment of gene expression in cancer
May 19, 2018 - Study brings fresh insights into biology of malaria parasite
May 19, 2018 - Microglia may play key role in slowing progression of prion diseases, research suggests
May 19, 2018 - Safety program successfully reduces SSIs in patients undergoing colorectal operations
May 19, 2018 - Clinical study supports usual medical care plus chiropractic care for low back pain
May 19, 2018 - Vermont legislators pass a drug importation law. So what?
May 19, 2018 - Trump proposes cutting planned parenthood funds. What does that mean?
May 19, 2018 - Cognitive training intervention reduces gait freezing in Parkinson’s patients, study shows
May 19, 2018 - Clinical trial begins enrollment to test safety of experimental MERS treatments
May 19, 2018 - Scientists disrupt two enzymes to shrink cancer cells
The ‘greatest pandemic in history’ was 100 years ago – but many of us still get the basic facts wrong

The ‘greatest pandemic in history’ was 100 years ago – but many of us still get the basic facts wrong

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print
Patients receive care for the Spanish flu at Walter Reed Military Hospital, in Washington, D.C. Credit: origins.osu.edu

This year marks the 100th anniversary of the great influenza pandemic of 1918. Between 50 and 100 million people are thought to have died, representing as much as 5 percent of the world’s population. Half a billion people were infected.

Especially remarkable was the 1918 flu’s predilection for taking the lives of otherwise healthy young adults, as opposed to children and the elderly, who usually suffer most. Some have called it the greatest pandemic in history.

The 1918 flu pandemic has been a regular subject of speculation over the last century. Historians and scientists have advanced numerous hypotheses regarding its origin, spread and consequences. As a result, many of us harbor misconceptions about it.

By correcting these 10 myths, we can better understand what actually happened and learn how to prevent and mitigate such disasters in the future.

1. The pandemic originated in Spain

No one believes the so-called “Spanish flu” originated in Spain.

The pandemic likely acquired this nickname because of World War I, which was in full swing at the time. The major countries involved in the war were keen to avoid encouraging their enemies, so reports of the extent of the flu were suppressed in Germany, Austria, France, the United Kingdom and the U.S. By contrast, neutral Spain had no need to keep the flu under wraps. That created the false impression that Spain was bearing the brunt of the disease.

In fact, the geographic origin of the flu is debated to this day, though hypotheses have suggested East Asia, Europe and even Kansas.

2. The pandemic was the work of a ‘super-virus’

The 1918 flu spread rapidly, killing 25 million people in just the first six months. This led some to fear the end of mankind, and has long fueled the supposition that the strain of influenza was particularly lethal.

However, more recent study suggests that the virus itself, though more lethal than other strains, was not fundamentally different from those that caused epidemics in other years.

Much of the high death rate can be attributed to crowding in military camps and urban environments, as well as poor nutrition and sanitation, which suffered during wartime. It’s now thought that many of the deaths were due to the development of bacterial pneumonias in lungs weakened by influenza.

3. The first wave of the pandemic was most lethal

Actually, the initial wave of deaths from the pandemic in the first half of 1918 was relatively low.

It was in the second wave, from October through December of that year, that the highest death rates were observed. A third wave in spring of 1919 was more lethal than the first but less so than the second.

Scientists now believe that the marked increase in deaths in the second wave was caused by conditions that favored the spread of a deadlier strain. People with mild cases stayed home, but those with severe cases were often crowded together in hospitals and camps, increasing transmission of a more lethal form of the virus.

4. The virus killed most people who were infected with it

In fact, the vast majority of the people who contracted the 1918 flu survived. National death rates among the infected generally did not exceed 20 percent.

However, death rates varied among different groups. In the U.S., deaths were particularly high among Native American populations, perhaps due to lower rates of exposure to past strains of influenza. In some cases, entire Native communities were wiped out.

Of course, even a 20 percent death rate vastly exceeds a typical flu, which kills less than one percent of those infected.

5. Therapies of the day had little impact on the disease

No specific anti-viral therapies were available during the 1918 flu. That’s still largely true today, where most medical care for the flu aims to support patients, rather than cure them.

One hypothesis suggests that many flu deaths could actually be attributed to aspirin poisoning. Medical authorities at the time recommended large doses of aspirin of up to 30 grams per day. Today, about four grams would be considered the maximum safe daily dose. Large doses of aspirin can lead to many of the pandemic’s symptoms, including bleeding.

However, death rates seem to have been equally high in some places in the world where aspirin was not so readily available, so the debate continues.

6. The pandemic dominated the day’s news

Public health officials, law enforcement officers and politicians had reasons to underplay the severity of the 1918 flu, which resulted in less coverage in the press. In addition to the fear that full disclosure might embolden enemies during wartime, they wanted to preserve public order and avoid panic.

However, officials did respond. At the height of the pandemic, quarantines were instituted in many cities. Some were forced to restrict essential services, including police and fire.

7. The pandemic changed the course of World War I

It’s unlikely that the flu changed the outcome of World War I, because combatants on both sides of the battlefield were relatively equally affected.

However, there is little doubt that the war profoundly influenced the course of the pandemic. Concentrating millions of troops created ideal circumstances for the development of more aggressive strains of the virus and its spread around the globe.

8. Widespread immunization ended the pandemic

Immunization against the flu as we know it today was not practiced in 1918, and thus played no role in ending the pandemic.

Exposure to prior strains of the flu may have offered some protection. For example, soldiers who had served in the military for years suffered lower rates of death than new recruits.

In addition, the rapidly mutating virus likely evolved over time into less lethal strains. This is predicted by models of natural selection. Because highly lethal strains kill their host rapidly, they cannot spread as easily as less lethal strains.

9. The genes of the virus have never been sequenced

In 2005, researchers announced that they had successfully determined the gene sequence of the 1918 influenza virus. The virus was recovered from the body of a flu victim buried in the permafrost of Alaska, as well as from samples of American soldiers who fell ill at the time.

Two years later, monkeys infected with the virus were found to exhibit the symptoms observed during the pandemic. Studies suggest that the monkeys died when their immune systems overreacted to the virus, a so-called “cytokine storm.” Scientists now believe that a similar immune system overreaction contributed to high death rates among otherwise healthy young adults in 1918.

10. The 1918 pandemic offers few lessons for 2018

Severe influenza epidemics tend to occur every few decades. Experts believe that the next one is a question not of “if” but “when.”

While few living people can recall the great flu pandemic of 1918, we can continue to learn its lessons, which range from the commonsense value of handwashing and immunizations to the potential of anti-viral drugs. Today we know more about how to isolate and handle large numbers of ill and dying patients, and we can prescribe antibiotics, not available in 1918, to combat secondary bacterial infections. Perhaps the best hope lies in improving nutrition, sanitation and standards of living, which render patients better able to resist the infection.

For the foreseeable future, flu epidemics will remain an annual feature of the rhythm of human life. As a society, we can only hope that we have learned the great pandemic’s lessons sufficiently well to quell another such worldwide catastrophe.


Explore further:
The mystery of a 1918 veteran and the flu pandemic

Provided by:
The Conversation

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles