Breaking News
July 19, 2018 - Researchers unravel how ALL invades the central nervous system
July 19, 2018 - Mother’s microbiome determines offspring’s risk of developing autism
July 19, 2018 - Refining standards of maternal-fetal care
July 19, 2018 - Stitching single cells together any which way you want to
July 19, 2018 - Study identifies RNA molecules that regulate male hormones in prostate cancer
July 19, 2018 - New machine-learning model shows promise in predicting undiagnosed dementia
July 19, 2018 - Sleep supports antioxidant processes, study suggests
July 19, 2018 - MiRagen Therapeutics Announces Initiation of Phase 2 Clinical Trial of MRG-201
July 19, 2018 - Unique brain ‘fingerprint’ can predict drug effectiveness
July 19, 2018 - Life on the border: Struggling to survive in Jordan
July 19, 2018 - CT scans may raise brain tumor risk
July 19, 2018 - Moderate alcohol intake linked with improved male fertility
July 19, 2018 - Alcohol-related cirrhosis mortality on the rise among young adults
July 19, 2018 - Study uncovers new protein complex that shields broken DNA ends
July 19, 2018 - Regular sunscreen use protects young people from melanoma
July 19, 2018 - Using non-invasive brain recordings to characterize activity in deep structures
July 19, 2018 - Mediterranean diet could influence academic performance through effects on sleep quality
July 19, 2018 - Woman’s pregnancy history may be linked to Alzheimer’s disease risk
July 19, 2018 - Study calls for new gold standard in research to treat non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
July 19, 2018 - Cancer patients receiving anti-PD-1 therapies may experience delayed skin reactions
July 19, 2018 - Scientists study adverse effects of carbon, silicon nanotubes and carbon nanofibers
July 19, 2018 - Keck Hospital of USC receives Magnet recognition for excellence in nursing
July 19, 2018 - Scientists identify hidden signals in RNAs that control protein synthesis
July 19, 2018 - Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine Not Tied to Spontaneous Abortion
July 19, 2018 - FDA OKs first drug made to reduce excessive sweating
July 19, 2018 - New findings do no support caffeine as effective appetite suppressant or weight-loss aid
July 19, 2018 - Study evaluates Neoteryx’s VAMS technology for monitoring HbA1c levels of diabetic children
July 19, 2018 - New clinical trial examines use of adrenaline to treat cardiac arrests
July 19, 2018 - Early surgical intervention may improve outcomes for patients with mitral valve disease
July 19, 2018 - Prolonged preoperative opioid use linked to adverse outcomes after total knee and hip arthroplasty
July 19, 2018 - Biophysicists use infrared sensor as new method for drug discovery
July 19, 2018 - Rat study shows negative effects of perinatal exposure to phthalates
July 19, 2018 - Children with disabilities endure long waits for life-changing medical equipment
July 19, 2018 - Ways to stay safe while camping and hiking
July 19, 2018 - People with HIV twice as likely to suffer from heart disease
July 19, 2018 - On-the-Job Stress Relief – Drugs.com MedNews
July 19, 2018 - Compounds found in green tea and wine may block formation of toxic metabolites
July 19, 2018 - Gene regulator associated with protein pileup in exfoliation glaucoma
July 19, 2018 - Trump administration summons immigrant infants
July 19, 2018 - FDA grants approval for first breast cancer drug through ‘Real-Time Oncology Review’
July 19, 2018 - Five tips for men seeking plastic surgery
July 19, 2018 - Researchers discover the reasons why some people get dizzy when hearing certain sounds
July 19, 2018 - Research project investigates snake venom treatment as antibiotic alternative for eye infections
July 19, 2018 - Melanoma could soon be detected using a blood test
July 19, 2018 - Exposure to bright light may have big impact on sleep-related behavior in children
July 19, 2018 - Deleting single gene in gut bacteria affects metabolism, reduces weight gain in mice
July 19, 2018 - New proteomics studies help gain more insights into Alzheimer’s, cancer and listeriosis
July 19, 2018 - Study finds major discrepancies in prescription drug labeling pregnancy information across four countries
July 19, 2018 - Cellectar’s CLR 131 Receives FDA Orphan Drug Designation for Treatment of Ewing’s Sarcoma
July 19, 2018 - Watching the immune system in action reveals what happens when things goes wrong
July 19, 2018 - Increasing blood sugar levels improves memory and performance in older adults
July 19, 2018 - Connection between self-regulation and obesity appears to be different for girls and boys
July 19, 2018 - Researchers develop new, less destructive method for whitening teeth
July 19, 2018 - Revving up innate control of viral infection requires a three-cell ignition
July 19, 2018 - Inaccurate direct-to-consumer raw genetic data can harm patients, new research suggests
July 19, 2018 - Weight loss surgery is effective under the right situations
July 19, 2018 - BioTek awarded patent for autofocus feature on microplate reader
July 19, 2018 - Low-carb diets reduce stiffness of arteries in women and promote weight loss in men
July 19, 2018 - New review examines cannabinoids’ potential for direct treatment of cancer
July 19, 2018 - Allergic responses may help protect the skin against cancer, research suggests
July 19, 2018 - Inappropriate Prescribing of Abx High in Urgent Care Centers
July 19, 2018 - Many at risk for HIV despite lifesaving pill
July 19, 2018 - Tips for doctors and parents on the harms of marijuana use for teens
July 18, 2018 - Researchers detect presence of IgE antibodies after kidney transplantation
July 18, 2018 - New technique allows researchers to create large scale, personalized bone grafts
July 18, 2018 - Smoking May Boost Atrial Fibrillation Risk
July 18, 2018 - Genome editing method targets AIDS virus
July 18, 2018 - These things matter: Medical complications are not inevitable, a physician writes
July 18, 2018 - Cognitive functions often wilt as water departs the body, shows study
July 18, 2018 - Origins of bread found 14,400 years ago in Jordan
July 18, 2018 - Low-dose ketamine found to be as effective as opioids for treating acute pain
July 18, 2018 - Novel bioengineering technique could help repair bone defects
July 18, 2018 - Researchers identify new potential target protein for colon cancer
July 18, 2018 - Air pollution contributes significantly to diabetes globally
July 18, 2018 - Cell membrane’s importance offers new strategy to fight infections
July 18, 2018 - Researchers identify key protein involved in irregular brain cell activity
July 18, 2018 - 3D modeling of drug resistance could lead to more effective cancer treatment
July 18, 2018 - Hunger hormones could be key to new treatments for drug, alcohol addiction
July 18, 2018 - Nitrate-cured meats may contribute to mania, study finds
July 18, 2018 - Why men may recover more quickly from influenza infections than women
Not all genetic tests should be publicly funded — here’s why

Not all genetic tests should be publicly funded — here’s why

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print
More knowledge about your genetic makeup enables you to make better-informed choices – but at what cost? Credit: Shutterstock

New genetic technologies hold great promise in their potential to treat patients based on their individual genetic information. Advances in mapping the human genome mean the cost of doing a genetic test has fallen dramatically, though the costs of these tests – and subsequent treatment – are still high.

It’s exciting to think we’re on the brink of a genomic revolution in health care. But just because new technology becomes available, it doesn’t mean it should automatically be funded by the government through Medicare or the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).

A number of types of genetic tests are currently available, including those for:

a person’s whole genome sequencea particular gene that carries the certainty of a diagnosisa gene that increases the person’s risk of developing a diseasea patient who already has a diagnosis, to test whether a particular medicine will be effective.

Each genetic test, each disease and each treatment pathway must be analysed to determine the balance of costs and benefits. We need to apply the same principles we do for any test, procedure or new medicine to determine whether it should be publicly funded: it must represent good value for money and be likely to improve health outcomes.

Gene-based therapies

Let’s consider the example of cancer treatment. Some medicines work only on tumours with particular genetic markers. By using a test to target the medicine only to cancer patients who have the marker, we can be more confident that the medicine is effective for those who are treated, thus avoiding unnecessary costs and possible side-effects. This could make the new medicine more affordable.

But for the seller of the medicine, greater effectiveness means they can ask a higher price. Indeed, they need to, because now there is a smaller target “market”.

The cystic fibrosis drug Ivacaftor, for instance, cost patients around A$250,000 a year before it was subsidised on the PBS. The clinical trials had only demonstrated effectiveness in patients with a G551D mutation, which is only 8.6% of the population with the disease.

The challenge for the government is whether we can afford to pay higher prices for each of these targeted medicines. Then there’s the issue of who will pay for the test, which will need to be done for everyone who might have the genetic marker. Should it be the government, private health insurers or individuals?

Without public funding of genetic testing, access to the effective treatment depends on whether you can afford to pay for the test, which undermines the equity principles of Medicare.

To overcome this challenge, Australia now requires integrated submissions of “co-dependent” technologies. This means, for instance, that if access to a new medicine on the PBS depends on the results of a test, the test should be publicly funded, and at a price that represents good value for money.

Testing for known diseases

More knowledge about your genetic makeup enables you to make better-informed choices: whether to seek preventive treatment; to change your behaviour to reduce risks; or to plan for the future.

In the context of specific known diseases, such testing is best done in a setting with genetic counselling, so the person can fully understand the implications of the knowledge and the decisions that may need to be made.

For a woman who has had breast cancer, a BRCA gene test can inform her choice about, for example, mastectomy to prevent a second breast cancer. Testing of immediate family members can determine if they carry the gene, allowing them to seek preventive treatment or more frequent screening.

But sometimes nothing can be done with the knowledge you obtained from your gene test. Knowing you have a higher risk of, say, dementia, could improve your well-being by giving you the chance to plan. Or it could just make you feel worse.

The costs and benefits of a genetic test depend greatly on whether there is effective prevention or treatment available, and what that treatment is.

Value for money

Australia assesses whether any test in health care represents good value for money by mapping out the treatment pathways that are available for each test result, and evaluating the costs and health benefits of each of these.

Based on such an assessment, the Medical Services Advisory Committee recently recommended a Medicare rebate of A$1,200 for genetic testing for hereditary mutations for breast and ovarian cancer, including the BRCA1 and 2 genes. This would cover most, if not all, of the cost of the test. The committee also recommended Medicare pay a A$400 rebate for predictive testing for family members.

The committee concluded the test would be good value for money, at around A$18,000 per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained (from breast and ovarian cancers avoided). A QALY is a way of quantifying the additional survival and quality of life from the test compared with not having the test available.

For a test for a single gene or genes that are a certain marker for specific diseases, assessment of cost effectiveness is relatively straightforward, particularly if there is an effective treatment available.

Predicting future diseases

For a test that indicates increased risk of developing diseases in the future, such as whole genome sequencing, the options are less clear.

The committee would ask: can the person reduce their risk by exercising more and eating better? And will the information increase their motivation to do so over and above medical advice already received? Or will it motivate them to seek more treatment over time? And how effective is this treatment?

Whole genome sequencing and genetic counselling is available privately in Australia now for around A$6,000 (including a health assessment) – so affordable only to the rich. It is not publicly funded because the benefits are uncertain.

It could just be “nice to know” (as such tests are marketed in the US); it could motivate the person to change their behaviour and thus lead to better health outcomes; or it could create anxiety and unnecessary intervention, and thus ultimately increase health care costs, not just for the individual but for the society.

There is no blanket answer to whether genomic testing is cost-effective. Each test, each disease and each treatment pathway must be analysed to determine the balance of costs and benefits, following the same approach as for other new medical technologies.


Explore further:
Whole-population testing for breast and ovarian cancer gene mutations is cost effective

Provided by:
The Conversation

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles