Breaking News
February 23, 2019 - Surprise rheumatoid arthritis discovery points to new treatment for joint inflammation
February 23, 2019 - A just-right fix for a tiny heart
February 23, 2019 - Owlstone Medical and Shanghai Renji Hospital collaborate to initiate breath biopsy lung cancer trial
February 23, 2019 - AMSBIO’s comprehensive portfolio of knock-out cell lines and lysates
February 23, 2019 - New app reliably determines physicians’ skills in forming accurate, efficient diagnoses
February 23, 2019 - Peripheral nerve injury can trigger the onset and spread of ALS, shows study
February 23, 2019 - Researchers uncover mechanisms that prevent tooth replacement in mice
February 23, 2019 - Once-a-day capsule offers new way to reduce symptoms of chronic breathlessness
February 23, 2019 - FDA Adds Boxed Warning for Increased Risk of Death with Gout Medicine Uloric (febuxostat)
February 23, 2019 - Phone-based intervention aids rheumatoid arthritis care
February 23, 2019 - Opioid epidemic makes eastern inroads and targets African-Americans
February 23, 2019 - New identified biomarker predicts patients who might benefit from HER2-targeted agents
February 23, 2019 - Study offers new insights into mechanisms of changes in erythrocytes under stress
February 23, 2019 - Antipsychotic polypharmacy may be beneficial for schizophrenia patients
February 23, 2019 - Researchers investigate how marijuana and tobacco co-use affects quit attempts by smokers
February 23, 2019 - Patients with diabetes mellitus have high risk of stable ischemic heart disease
February 23, 2019 - Transparency on healthcare prices played key role in Arizona health system’s turnaround
February 23, 2019 - A comprehensive, multinational review of peppers around the world
February 23, 2019 - Study finds modest decrease in burnout among physicians
February 23, 2019 - A simple change can drastically reduce unnecessary tests for urinary tract infections
February 23, 2019 - Deep Learning-Enhanced Device Detects Diabetic Retinopathy
February 23, 2019 - Researchers discover new binding partner for amyloid precursor protein
February 23, 2019 - Modest decrease seen in burnout among physicians, researchers say | News Center
February 23, 2019 - Transplanting bone marrow of young mice into old mice prevents cognitive decline
February 23, 2019 - Mogrify to accelerate novel IP and cell therapies using $3.7m USD funding
February 23, 2019 - Johns Hopkins study describes cells that may help speed bone repair
February 23, 2019 - Scientists demonstrate influence of food odors on proteostasis
February 23, 2019 - Researchers unlock the secret behind reproduction of fish called ‘Mary’
February 23, 2019 - Acupuncture Could Help Ease Menopausal Symptoms
February 23, 2019 - Researchers use AI to detect early signs of Alzheimer’s
February 23, 2019 - On recovery, vulnerability and ritual: An exhibit in white | News Center
February 23, 2019 - Memory Stored in Unexpected Region of the Brain
February 23, 2019 - Several health experts worldwide gather at EUDONORGAN event
February 23, 2019 - Discovery of potent compound in native California shrub may lead to treatment for Alzheimer’s
February 22, 2019 - Researchers create new map of the brain’s own immune system
February 22, 2019 - ICHE’s reviews on surgical infections, unnecessary urine tests, and nurses’ role in antibiotic stewardship
February 22, 2019 - UK Research and Innovation invests £200 million to create new generation of AI leaders
February 22, 2019 - Takeda collaboration to boost fight against Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases
February 22, 2019 - Heavy drinking may change DNA, leading to increased craving for alcohol
February 22, 2019 - U.S. opioid deaths jump fourfold in 20 years; epidemic shifts to Eastern states | News Center
February 22, 2019 - 5 Questions with William Turner on Diversity in Medicine
February 22, 2019 - HHS Finalizes Rule Seeking To Expel Planned Parenthood From Family Planning Program
February 22, 2019 - Researchers uncover biochemical pathway that may help identify drugs to treat Alzheimer’s
February 22, 2019 - Biologist uses new grant to find ways to eliminate schistosomiasis
February 22, 2019 - Bag-mask ventilation to help patients breathe during intubation prevents complications
February 22, 2019 - AbbVie Announces New Drug Application Accepted for Priority Review by FDA for Upadacitinib for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
February 22, 2019 - Nature versus nurture and addiction
February 22, 2019 - New website connects researchers with data experts, resources | News Center
February 22, 2019 - Today’s Concerns About Drug Prices Echo The Past
February 22, 2019 - CT and Doppler equipment have low accuracy in detecting cerebral vasospasm and ischemia
February 22, 2019 - Study finds out similarity in function between healthy retina cell and tumor cell
February 22, 2019 - CWRU awarded NIH grant to identify effective treatments for intimate partner violence
February 22, 2019 - Oncotype DX Not Cost-Effective for Low-Risk Breast Cancer
February 22, 2019 - Scientists discover new type of immune cells that are essential for forming heart valves
February 22, 2019 - Talk About Déjà Vu: Senators Set To Re-Enact Drug Price Hearing Of 60 Years Ago
February 22, 2019 - Genetic defect linked to pediatric liver disease identified
February 22, 2019 - New cellular atlas could provide a deeper insight into blinding diseases
February 22, 2019 - Growing number of cancer survivors, fewer providers point to challenge in meeting care needs
February 22, 2019 - Innovative compound offers a new therapeutic approach to treat multiple sclerosis
February 22, 2019 - $1.5 million grant to develop opioid treatment program for jail detainees
February 22, 2019 - FDA’s new proposed rule would update regulatory requirements for sunscreen products in the U.S
February 22, 2019 - Most Hip, Knee Replacements Last Decades, Study Finds
February 22, 2019 - Wellness problems prevalent among ob-gyn residents
February 22, 2019 - In the Spotlight: “The world is your oyster in geriatrics”
February 22, 2019 - Successful testing of multi-organ “human-on-a-chip” could replace animals as test subjects
February 22, 2019 - Analysis of cervical precancer shows decline in two strains of HPV
February 22, 2019 - Sugary stent eases suturing of blood vessels
February 22, 2019 - From surgery to psychiatry: A medical student reevaluates his motivations
February 22, 2019 - Is New App From Feds Your Answer To Navigating Medicare Coverage? Yes And No
February 22, 2019 - New pacemakers powered by heartbeats could reduce need for surgery
February 22, 2019 - The United States records highest drug overdose death rates
February 22, 2019 - Heart attacks more likely to be fatal in women and rates are rising
February 22, 2019 - Morning walks could be better than drugs at lowering blood pressure
February 22, 2019 - Phase 1 data reinforce safety profile of new drug for treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy
February 22, 2019 - Vitamin D supplementation less effective in the presence of obesity, shows study
February 22, 2019 - Novostia raises CHF 6.5 million to advance its aortic, mitral heart valve to clinical trials
February 22, 2019 - CPRIT awards nearly $20 million to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
February 22, 2019 - Sarepta Announces FDA Acceptance of Golodirsen (SRP-4053) New Drug Application for Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Amenable to Skipping Exon 53
February 22, 2019 - An institutional effort to reduce the amount of opioids prescribed following lumbar surgery
February 22, 2019 - Family-history-based models perform better than non-family-history based models
Can insurers use genetic testing results? A reader wants to know

Can insurers use genetic testing results? A reader wants to know

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print

This week, I answer questions from readers concerned about health insurance roadblocks in the face of a serious illness or medical crisis.

Q: I think genetic testing could be a great tool for physicians. My fear is what the insurance industry will do with the information, especially in today’s political climate. Could they decide that you have a preexisting condition and charge a higher rate, or not cover you at all?

No, they can’t do that — not now, anyway. Under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008, health insurers can’t use your genetic information, including your family medical history, genetic test results and genetic counseling or other genetic services, to discriminate against you.

That means health insurers can’t use your genetic information when making decisions about your eligibility for health insurance, coverage terms or how much you’ll pay.

If you develop symptoms of a disease or are diagnosed with a medical condition, however, GINA no longer protects you. That’s where the Affordable Care Act steps in. It prohibits health plans from turning people down or charging them more because they have a preexisting condition.

“GINA did something good, and the ACA was the next important step,” said Sonia Mateu Suter, a law professor at George Washington University who specializes in genetics and the law.

However, last month the Trump administration said it won’t defend that part of the law, which is being challenged in a lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of 20 states.

The administration said that since the penalty for not having health insurance has been eliminated starting in 2019, the provisions that guarantee coverage to people with preexisting conditions and prohibit insurers from charging them higher premiums should be struck down as well.

The issue is a priority with voters. In a June poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation, two-thirds of voters said that continuing protections for people with preexisting conditions was either the single most important factor or very important in their vote during the elections this fall. (Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent program of the foundation.)

Q: My husband fainted in the middle of the night. He received an MRI at a hospital emergency department in Kingston, N.Y., that is not in our insurance network.

Two months later, we received a bill for $23,657.39. Our insurance company paid $3,226.40, or 90 percent of what they considered to be a reasonable cost for the services provided. Our bill was for the balance.

Even though New York has a law that protects consumers against surprise medical bills, I learned that it doesn’t apply to us because our health plan is “self-funded.” Is there anything else that we can do?

You’re in a tough spot. The ACA prohibits most plans from charging consumers more in copayments and coinsurance for out-of-network emergency care than they’d owe if they were at an in-network facility.

But federal law doesn’t prevent out-of-network providers from billing consumers for the balance when a health plan doesn’t pay in full. This can happen because the plan doesn’t have negotiated rates with providers that aren’t in the network.

New York is one of six states that have laws with comprehensive protection for consumers against so-called surprise bills, according to an analysis by researchers at Georgetown University’s Health Policy Institute that was published by the Commonwealth Fund last year.

The others are California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois and Maryland. Another 15 states have limited consumer protections in this area.

But self-funded plans such as yours, in which your employer pays medical claims directly instead of buying an insurance policy for that purpose, are exempt from this type of state regulation.

In this circumstance, your company’s human resources department may be your best bet, said Jack Hoadley, research professor emeritus at Georgetown’s Health Policy Institute, who co-authored the Commonwealth analysis.

“The employer may say, ‘I feel an obligation to my employee and we’ll cover this,'” he said. “But they can choose not to do that.”

Q: My wife has been taking Avonex for multiple sclerosis for 20 years. Our health plan’s coverage changed this year, but Express Scripts, which manages our pharmacy benefit, didn’t communicate the change until after it took effect. They mailed us a month’s worth of Avonex in February, and a few weeks later we received an invoice for $6,000. Express Scripts would not let us return the medicine for a refund. They said that they explained we would be billed that amount when they called to remind us we were due for a refill, but that’s not true. Do we have any recourse?

There is no easy answer for you. If you go to a brick-and-mortar pharmacy to pick up a prescription and you think the cost is too high, you can refuse the medication at the counter and walk away. But that’s not generally possible with a mail-order prescription. Once it arrives, it’s yours.

“The chain of custody is broken,” said Jennifer Luddy, a spokeswoman for Express Scripts, which manages the pharmacy benefits for companies and insurers. “We don’t know if it’s been opened or tampered with.”

Luddy said that typically employers communicate changes to workers’ pharmacy benefits for the upcoming year during the annual open-enrollment period. On an ongoing basis, drug copayment information is also available through the Express Scripts’ website, mobile app or by phone, she said.

However, there may be other factors to consider, say patient advocates. For example, about half of people with multiple sclerosis have cognitive problems, said Bari Talente, executive vice president of advocacy at the National Multiple Sclerosis Society.

“People need to make sure that the person who’s taking the drug really understands that the cost is changing,” Talente said.

Please visit khn.org/columnists to send comments or ideas for future topics for the Insuring Your Health column.

Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles