Breaking News
January 17, 2019 - Better understanding of aggressive brain tumour
January 17, 2019 - Why is life expectancy in the U.S. going down? A Q&A
January 17, 2019 - The Electronics Industry Sees Money In Your Health
January 17, 2019 - Hypertension drug may improve effectiveness of ovarian cancer treatment
January 17, 2019 - Scientists reveal key mechanism in worms that controls cell’s response to stress
January 17, 2019 - How Patch Clamp Technology Can Benefit Ion Channel Research
January 16, 2019 - Researchers cultivate organoids that perfectly mimic blood vessels
January 16, 2019 - Sound Pharmaceuticals Advances Phase 2 Hearing Loss Clinical Trial in Cystic Fibrosis
January 16, 2019 - Unraveling the genetic causes of skin cancer
January 16, 2019 - Higher percentages of saturated fat in low-carb diets may not harm cholesterol levels, new analysis suggests
January 16, 2019 - Using bottled or tap water impacts health benefits of green tea
January 16, 2019 - Best trained alert dogs have potential to improve Type 1 diabetes patients’ quality of life
January 16, 2019 - States with lower incidence of melanoma have higher mortality rates
January 16, 2019 - Pollution on the London Underground found to be dangerously high
January 16, 2019 - Breast cancer cells in mice coaxed to turn into harmless fat cells
January 16, 2019 - Study connects the genetic background of autistic spectrum disorders with stem cell dysfunction
January 16, 2019 - When activated, ‘social’ brain circuits inhibit feeding behavior in mice | News Center
January 16, 2019 - How Exercise May Help Keep Our Memory Sharp
January 16, 2019 - Researchers identify a key regulator that stops excessive inflammation
January 16, 2019 - TGF-beta signaling pathway in uterine cells protects against cancer
January 16, 2019 - MD Anderson Cancer Center collaborates with Dragonfly for new immunotherapy drug clinical trials
January 16, 2019 - Drug Repurposing May Provide More Psychiatric Tx Options
January 16, 2019 - A new brain imaging study challenges the dominant theoretical model of autism spectrum disorders
January 16, 2019 - GoFundMe CEO: ‘Gigantic Gaps’ In Health System Showing Up In Crowdfunding
January 16, 2019 - Induced neuronal cells derived from fibroblasts are similar to neurons in the brain
January 16, 2019 - New study finds link between childhood abuse and suicide in later life
January 16, 2019 - Lifestyle and health factors that are good for the heart can also prevent diabetes
January 16, 2019 - Scientists take another step in understanding bacteria that cause Salmonella epidemic
January 16, 2019 - Look to Your Aunts, Uncles and Parents for Clues to Your Longevity
January 16, 2019 - Study finds ADHD drugs are unlikely to cause cardiac damage in children who take them
January 16, 2019 - Call The Midwife! (If The Doctor Doesn’t Object)
January 16, 2019 - Changes in hippocampal structural connectivity differentiate responders of electroconvulsive therapy
January 16, 2019 - Study sheds light on the deadly venom of Mojave rattlesnakes
January 16, 2019 - University of Nebraska to develop new drugs that prevent and counteract effects of radiation exposure
January 16, 2019 - Sugar-based stent makes precarious sewing process easier
January 16, 2019 - FDA-approved drug hampers cancer metastasis in animal model, shows study
January 16, 2019 - Low-level cannabis use can change the adolescent brain
January 16, 2019 - MTC in Rouen acquires Robocath’s R-One robot for future healthcare practitioner training
January 16, 2019 - OSSIO granted FDA 510(k) market clearance for OSSIOfiber Bone Pin Family
January 16, 2019 - Childhood body composition may play a role in future respiratory health
January 16, 2019 - Outdated commissioning methods are failing mental health services in the UK, reveals report
January 16, 2019 - Unconventional immune cells trigger disturbed cytokine production in human spondyloarthritis
January 16, 2019 - Patients Turn To GoFundMe When Money And Hope Run Out
January 16, 2019 - Researchers develop novel viral identification method
January 16, 2019 - Study proposes improvements in pharmacological study of cognitive function enhancers in schizophrenia
January 16, 2019 - Study points to potential new biomarker and drug target for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
January 16, 2019 - Differences in geographic origin of genes may affect mitochondrial function
January 16, 2019 - Study analyzes vaccine-preventable infections in children who receive solid organ transplants
January 16, 2019 - MiRagen Announces New Clinical Data in Patients With Three Different Types of Blood Cancers Treated With Cobomarsen
January 16, 2019 - Scientists uncover why knee joint injury leads to osteoarthritis
January 16, 2019 - Salk team uses new model to study health effects of AMP-activated protein kinase
January 16, 2019 - Research reveals novel approach to suppressing chemotherapy-induced tumor growth
January 16, 2019 - Researchers reveal how fasting leads to better overall health
January 16, 2019 - Deprivation and neglect in early childhood have impact on cognitive functioning in adolescence, shows study
January 16, 2019 - Training Students to use Imaging Techniques: NMR and EPR
January 16, 2019 - Nerve transfer surgery restores arm movement in children with acute flaccid myelitis
January 16, 2019 - Exelixis Announces U.S. FDA Approval of Cabometyx (cabozantinib) Tablets for Previously Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma
January 16, 2019 - DNA vaccine reduces both toxic proteins linked to Alzheimer’s
January 16, 2019 - Even in the U.S., poor women often can't afford tampons, pads
January 16, 2019 - One time use of Marijuana could affect teen brains finds study
January 16, 2019 - Persistent Opioid Use High in Head, Neck Cancer Patients
January 16, 2019 - Questions to ask your doctor about post pregnancy care: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia
January 16, 2019 - Neurons with good housekeeping are protected from Alzheimer’s
January 16, 2019 - Is mindfulness worthy of all the hype?
January 16, 2019 - Physical Activity, Any Type or Amount, Cuts Health Risk from Sitting
January 16, 2019 - New understanding in the evolution of human feet
January 15, 2019 - AHA: New Cholesterol Guidelines Put Ethnicity in the Spotlight
January 15, 2019 - Different brain areas linked to smoking and drinking
January 15, 2019 - Henry Marsh shares insights into neurosurgery and more at Dean’s Lecture Series
January 15, 2019 - Want to Live Longer? For Just 30 Minutes a Day, Do Anything Else But Sit
January 15, 2019 - The Current issue of “The view from here” is concerned with Targets
January 15, 2019 - Plain packaging sparked tobacco price rises, new study finds
January 15, 2019 - Sedentary lifestyles can be unhealthy, physical activity can lower risk
January 15, 2019 - Gut microbiome may help prevent development of cow’s milk allergy
January 15, 2019 - Lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals more likely to suffer severe substance use disorders
January 15, 2019 - New England Journal of Medicine Publishes Positive Results of the Pivotal Trial of Cablivi (caplacizumab) for Rare Blood Clotting Disorder
January 15, 2019 - Levels of inflammatory marker (CRP) linked to housing type and tenure
January 15, 2019 - Three gifts I’m glad I gave myself in 2018
January 15, 2019 - Columbia’s Pediatrics Department Names New Vice Chairs, Expands Leadership
January 15, 2019 - US FDA Accepts Regulatory Submissions for Review of Tafamidis to Treat Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy
Legal scholars sound alarm on academies’ report about returning research results to participants

Legal scholars sound alarm on academies’ report about returning research results to participants

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print

In a Policy Forum article appearing in the Oct. 12 issue of Science, leading bioethics and legal scholars sound the alarm about a recent report from National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. The Academies’ report on “Returning Individual Research Results to Participants” makes recommendations on how to share research results and data with people who agree to participate in research studies and calls for problematic changes to federal law. This report proclaims its support for research participants’ rights but, in reality, creates major new roadblocks to the return of data and results to participants and would roll back important privacy protections people have under current law, according to the analysis in the new Science article.

The article’s authors, Susan M. Wolf and Barbara J. Evans, collaborated as part of the “LawSeqSM: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application” project funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute and National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Wolf is the McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota and is Chair of the University’s Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. Evans is the Mary Ann and Lawrence E. Faust Professor of Law, Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Director of the Center for Biotechnology & Law at the University of Houston.

“Researchers conducting imaging, environmental health, and genetics studies have offered participants their research findings for years,” Wolf and Evans point out. Research participants value access to their results for a wide range of reasons, including protecting their health, and evaluating the privacy risks posed by circulation of their data. People value access to results even when the results are still under study and may be uncertain. Over the past 20 years, researchers have developed pathways for returning results in situations where the results raise clinical concerns, such as suggesting that the person may have a medical condition that needs clinical follow-up evaluation. These pathways are ethically sound and protect the participants’ safety by ensuring compliance with necessary laws and regulations. Unfortunately, the Policy Forum article asserts, “the Academies’ report rejects this widely supported, legally sound approach” and instead recommends restrictions on access to research results and data.

Wolf and Evans write that, “Efforts to turn back the clock on return of results appear rooted in confusion about the law.” The Academies’ report incorporates incorrect statements about the federal CLIA legal framework, which aims to ensure the quality of laboratory tests conducted for health care purposes.

The report overstates the degree to which research laboratories can be regulated under the CLIA statute.

The Academies’ report also conflicts with existing federal privacy laws that protect research participants’ access to their own data. For more than 50 years, Congress has treated individual access to one’s own data as an essential element of personal privacy protection, as seen in the Privacy Act that protects data stored in governmental databases, the HIPAA Privacy Rule that protects Americans’ medical privacy, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act that expanded HIPAA’s protections to genetic information. Only by seeing the personal data collected can an individual assess the privacy risks involved. Yet the Academies’ report recommends that an individual’s access to their data be restricted to the subset of data that meets certain quality standards. Wolf and Evans explain how this would undermine federal privacy protections, which recognize that privacy can be put at risk even by low- quality data and data that is wrongly attributed to a person.

Finally, the Policy Forum article criticizes the Academies’ recommendation to load multiple decisions about return of results on Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). This would place “substantial new burdens on IRBs, despite extensive literature on the limits of IRB decision making.” The report “maximizes the burden on IRBs by mischaracterizing existing consensus guidelines and suggesting that IRBs start over.”

Wolf and Evans conclude, “The Academies’ report endorses the idea of participant access to results and data, but then builds daunting barriers. The report rejects established legal rights of access, two decades of consensus guidelines, and abundant data showing that participants benefit from access while incurring little risk. The report too often prefers paternalistic silence over partnership.”

“True progress on return of results requires accepting participants’ established rights of access and respecting the value that participants place on broad access to their data and results. The next step is not to build barriers but to promote transparency.”

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles