Breaking News
March 27, 2019 - Managing MS
March 27, 2019 - Researchers reveal how receptor TLR-9 protects against lupus
March 27, 2019 - Doctors share story of daughter’s treatment for leukemia
March 27, 2019 - Medical Center Hosts Networking Session for Women’s History Month
March 27, 2019 - Positive link found between anxiety during childhood, adolescence with later alcohol use disorders
March 27, 2019 - Coronary artery calcium indicates patients’ imminent risk of a heart attack
March 27, 2019 - Luxia Scientific partners with Life Genomics to commercialize microbiome-based tests in the Nordic countries
March 26, 2019 - New mathematical algorithm objectively classifies shapes of neurons in the brain
March 26, 2019 - Research suggests oxytocin as potential new obesity treatment
March 26, 2019 - Education may not protect against dementia as previously thought
March 26, 2019 - Stanford acquires archive of palliative care pioneer Elisabeth Kübler-Ross | News Center
March 26, 2019 - New research aims to turn worms against parasite-associated cancer
March 26, 2019 - Psychological evolution may help explain differences between male and female serial killers
March 26, 2019 - New molecular mechanism involved in pancreas repair identified
March 26, 2019 - Obesity linked to reproductive problems in women with type 1 diabetes
March 26, 2019 - New short-pulse ultrasound technique enhances drug delivery to brains of mice
March 26, 2019 - Researchers uncover mechanism that initiates sexual organs maturation
March 26, 2019 - DermBiont Begins Phase 2 Clinical Trial for Athlete’s Foot with a Live Bacterial Topical Probiotic
March 26, 2019 - Persons with Alzheimer’s disease have a higher risk of head injuries
March 26, 2019 - Mental health issues associated with income inequalities in Indigenous people
March 26, 2019 - Participation in sports linked with fewer depressive symptoms in children
March 26, 2019 - Brain process common to sleep and aging discovered
March 26, 2019 - People under age 50 with hearing loss more likely to misuse alcohol and drugs
March 26, 2019 - People with and without cancer use different dosages of cannabis formulations, study shows
March 26, 2019 - Young people at risk of addiction show differences in key brain region
March 26, 2019 - In virtual exchange, students in California and Lebanon unite to improve refugee health
March 26, 2019 - Trump Administration Changes Course, Asks Court To Strike Down ACA
March 26, 2019 - People with untreated diabetes develop signs of Alzheimer’s disease at a faster rate
March 26, 2019 - Study explains how bright colors evolved and diversified in male guppies
March 26, 2019 - Savings from lower insurance costs of growth hormone drugs not passed on to patients
March 26, 2019 - Study highlights the need to pay more attention on specific nutritional needs of female athletes
March 26, 2019 - Sleep quality varies throughout menstrual cycle in young women
March 26, 2019 - A1c diabetes blood test found to be unreliable
March 26, 2019 - Younger Female Blood Donors Vulnerable to Iron Deficiency
March 26, 2019 - Prostate cancer cells ‘spit out’ a protein that promotes tumor growth
March 26, 2019 - Finding the elusive drinking ‘brake’
March 26, 2019 - Using the Mastermind strategy in brain research
March 26, 2019 - Symptomatic pharmacotherapy of elderly people should be regularly monitored
March 26, 2019 - Synthetic biological logic gate could one day be used to modify cellular function
March 26, 2019 - Damage to anxiety-associated brain region heightens monkeys’ defensive response
March 26, 2019 - Researchers uncover large-scale brain patterns and networks which control sleep
March 26, 2019 - Scientific Symposium at LABVOLUTION focuses on key issues in life sciences
March 26, 2019 - Screen time plus snacking could increase risk for metabolic syndrome in teens
March 26, 2019 - Attention, Seniors: Drink More Water and Head Off Disease
March 26, 2019 - Peptide shows promise for protecting kidneys from nephritis
March 26, 2019 - Causes of diabetes decline or disappear when ‘zombie cells’ are removed, shows study
March 26, 2019 - Scientists identify common genetic variants associated with post-stroke recovery
March 26, 2019 - Study finds link between menopause and changes in body composition
March 26, 2019 - Higher levels of sex hormones in older men related to lower biological age
March 26, 2019 - Research links participation in team sports to larger hippocampal volumes in children
March 26, 2019 - Cerveau announces research collaboration agreement with Eisai for novel tau imaging agent
March 26, 2019 - New technique measures frequency of sounds emitted from biological structures
March 26, 2019 - Removal of ‘zombie cells’ alleviates causes of diabetes in obese mice
March 26, 2019 - Women exposed to deepwater horizon oil spill continue to experience PTSD symptoms
March 26, 2019 - Shaping new treatments for tuberculosis
March 26, 2019 - Understanding genetic interactions holds key to new personalized therapies
March 26, 2019 - Nervous system relies on guidance cues for neuronal axons to reach destinations
March 26, 2019 - Altering gut microbiome may be potential treatment option for PCOS
March 26, 2019 - Moleculin Files with FDA for Expedited Approval Pathway for Annamycin
March 26, 2019 - GPs play pivotal role in ensuring success of new Faster Diagnosis Standard for Cancer
March 26, 2019 - New clues discovered to lung transplant rejection
March 26, 2019 - New study offers insight into development of delusions
March 26, 2019 - Children’s ball pits full of pathogenic microbes
March 26, 2019 - Exploring pathophysiological factors that link sleep problems and Alzheimer’s disease
March 26, 2019 - Walking downhill after meals can reduce bone resorption in postmenopausal women with diabetes
March 26, 2019 - USA LESS Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of LEOPARD Miracle Honey Due to Presence of Undeclared Sildenafil
March 26, 2019 - CT scan prior to spine fusion finds almost half of patients had undiagnosed osteoporosis
March 26, 2019 - After 2 Apparent Student Suicides, Parkland Grieves Again
March 25, 2019 - Inherited form of rickets improves more with new injectable medicine than conventional therapy
March 25, 2019 - Trastuzumab Tied to Higher Long-Term Risk for Heart Failure
March 25, 2019 - Personal context directly affects CPAP use
March 25, 2019 - Mosquito tracking key to preventing disease outbreaks
March 25, 2019 - Scientists Detect Hidden Signals from Beneficial Bacteria
March 25, 2019 - Treating women with thyroid antibodies with Levothyroxine do not increase live birth rate
March 25, 2019 - Brain area that only processes spoken, not written words identified
March 25, 2019 - Race and ethnicity influence fracture risk in diabetic patients
March 25, 2019 - Researchers report new regenerative medicine approach for treating osteoarthritis of the knee
March 25, 2019 - Exposure to dim light at night may contribute to spread of breast cancer to bones
March 25, 2019 - Benefits of osteoporosis treatment in postmenopausal women outweigh the perceived risks
March 25, 2019 - Researchers find evidence of Cryptosporidium parasite in Minnesota’s public water systems
Legal scholars sound alarm on academies’ report about returning research results to participants

Legal scholars sound alarm on academies’ report about returning research results to participants

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print

In a Policy Forum article appearing in the Oct. 12 issue of Science, leading bioethics and legal scholars sound the alarm about a recent report from National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. The Academies’ report on “Returning Individual Research Results to Participants” makes recommendations on how to share research results and data with people who agree to participate in research studies and calls for problematic changes to federal law. This report proclaims its support for research participants’ rights but, in reality, creates major new roadblocks to the return of data and results to participants and would roll back important privacy protections people have under current law, according to the analysis in the new Science article.

The article’s authors, Susan M. Wolf and Barbara J. Evans, collaborated as part of the “LawSeqSM: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application” project funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute and National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Wolf is the McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota and is Chair of the University’s Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. Evans is the Mary Ann and Lawrence E. Faust Professor of Law, Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Director of the Center for Biotechnology & Law at the University of Houston.

“Researchers conducting imaging, environmental health, and genetics studies have offered participants their research findings for years,” Wolf and Evans point out. Research participants value access to their results for a wide range of reasons, including protecting their health, and evaluating the privacy risks posed by circulation of their data. People value access to results even when the results are still under study and may be uncertain. Over the past 20 years, researchers have developed pathways for returning results in situations where the results raise clinical concerns, such as suggesting that the person may have a medical condition that needs clinical follow-up evaluation. These pathways are ethically sound and protect the participants’ safety by ensuring compliance with necessary laws and regulations. Unfortunately, the Policy Forum article asserts, “the Academies’ report rejects this widely supported, legally sound approach” and instead recommends restrictions on access to research results and data.

Wolf and Evans write that, “Efforts to turn back the clock on return of results appear rooted in confusion about the law.” The Academies’ report incorporates incorrect statements about the federal CLIA legal framework, which aims to ensure the quality of laboratory tests conducted for health care purposes.

The report overstates the degree to which research laboratories can be regulated under the CLIA statute.

The Academies’ report also conflicts with existing federal privacy laws that protect research participants’ access to their own data. For more than 50 years, Congress has treated individual access to one’s own data as an essential element of personal privacy protection, as seen in the Privacy Act that protects data stored in governmental databases, the HIPAA Privacy Rule that protects Americans’ medical privacy, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act that expanded HIPAA’s protections to genetic information. Only by seeing the personal data collected can an individual assess the privacy risks involved. Yet the Academies’ report recommends that an individual’s access to their data be restricted to the subset of data that meets certain quality standards. Wolf and Evans explain how this would undermine federal privacy protections, which recognize that privacy can be put at risk even by low- quality data and data that is wrongly attributed to a person.

Finally, the Policy Forum article criticizes the Academies’ recommendation to load multiple decisions about return of results on Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). This would place “substantial new burdens on IRBs, despite extensive literature on the limits of IRB decision making.” The report “maximizes the burden on IRBs by mischaracterizing existing consensus guidelines and suggesting that IRBs start over.”

Wolf and Evans conclude, “The Academies’ report endorses the idea of participant access to results and data, but then builds daunting barriers. The report rejects established legal rights of access, two decades of consensus guidelines, and abundant data showing that participants benefit from access while incurring little risk. The report too often prefers paternalistic silence over partnership.”

“True progress on return of results requires accepting participants’ established rights of access and respecting the value that participants place on broad access to their data and results. The next step is not to build barriers but to promote transparency.”

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles