Breaking News
February 22, 2019 - Successful testing of multi-organ “human-on-a-chip” could replace animals as test subjects
February 22, 2019 - Analysis of cervical precancer shows decline in two strains of HPV
February 22, 2019 - Sugary stent eases suturing of blood vessels
February 22, 2019 - From surgery to psychiatry: A medical student reevaluates his motivations
February 22, 2019 - Is New App From Feds Your Answer To Navigating Medicare Coverage? Yes And No
February 22, 2019 - New pacemakers powered by heartbeats could reduce need for surgery
February 22, 2019 - The United States records highest drug overdose death rates
February 22, 2019 - Phase 1 data reinforce safety profile of new drug for treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy
February 22, 2019 - Vitamin D supplementation less effective in the presence of obesity, shows study
February 22, 2019 - Sarepta Announces FDA Acceptance of Golodirsen (SRP-4053) New Drug Application for Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Amenable to Skipping Exon 53
February 22, 2019 - An institutional effort to reduce the amount of opioids prescribed following lumbar surgery
February 22, 2019 - Failure to take statins leads to higher mortality rates | News Center
February 22, 2019 - New study explains why some patients report phantom sensations after limb amputation
February 22, 2019 - First motor-controlled heart valves implanted by Mainz University Medical Center
February 22, 2019 - Novel preclinical model mimics persistent interneuron loss seen in preterm infants
February 22, 2019 - Global health burden of glaucoma has increased, study reveals
February 22, 2019 - A holistic approach key to minimize treatment complexity in patients with interstitial lung disease
February 22, 2019 - 1 in 10 middle-aged Chinese adults are at high risk for heart disease, finds study
February 22, 2019 - More than half a million breast cancer patient’s lives saved by improvements in treatment
February 22, 2019 - Study finds no evidence that tougher policies prevent teenage cannabis use
February 22, 2019 - New blood test detects genetic disorders in fetuses
February 22, 2019 - Lower Self-Perception Observed in Children With Amblyopia
February 22, 2019 - Up to 15 percent of children have sleep apnea, yet 90 percent go undiagnosed
February 22, 2019 - Rare pulmonary defect prompts parents’ nationwide search for answers | News Center
February 22, 2019 - Lesbian and bisexual women at greater risk of being overweight, study finds
February 22, 2019 - UQ research may explain why vitamin D is essential for brain health
February 22, 2019 - Heart Attacks Rising Among Younger Women
February 22, 2019 - How your smartphone is affecting your relationship
February 22, 2019 - Orthopaedic surgeon receives prestigious award, $10 million grant | News Center
February 22, 2019 - New sepsis test could save thousands of lives
February 22, 2019 - Cervical cancer could be eradicated by 2100
February 21, 2019 - Sustained smoking cessation can lower risk of seropositive RA
February 21, 2019 - Thousands with chronic UTIs are not receiving the treatment they need
February 21, 2019 - Are teens getting high on social media? The surprising study seeking the pot-Instagram link
February 21, 2019 - Stanford expands biobank services | News Center
February 21, 2019 - Scientists identify link between drinking contexts and early onset intoxication among adolescents
February 21, 2019 - Strong social support may reduce cardiovascular disease risk in postmenopausal women
February 21, 2019 - Rapid expansion of interventions could prevent up to 13 million cases of cervical cancer within 50 years
February 21, 2019 - Motif Bio Receives Complete Response Letter From The FDA
February 21, 2019 - Researchers map previously unknown disease in children
February 21, 2019 - A skeptical look at popular diets: Going gluten-free
February 21, 2019 - Podcast: KHN’s ‘What The Health?’ How Safe Are Your Supplements?
February 21, 2019 - Factors associated with increased risk of developing surgical site infections
February 21, 2019 - Anticipatory signals in eye movements can help measure attentive capacity, learning with greater precision
February 21, 2019 - Study explores daily exposure to indoor air pollutants
February 21, 2019 - Evening exercise does not negatively affect sleep, may also reduce hunger
February 21, 2019 - Artificial intelligence technique can be used to identify alcohol misuse in trauma setting
February 21, 2019 - Overweight, obesity in adolescence associated with increased risk of renal cancer later in life
February 21, 2019 - BGU develops new AI platform for monitoring and predicting ALS progression
February 21, 2019 - Researchers discover a new promising target to improve HIV vaccines
February 21, 2019 - Brief Anesthesia in Infancy Does Not Mar Neurodevelopment
February 21, 2019 - Gaming system helps with autism diagnosis
February 21, 2019 - Heart Disease: Six Things Women Should Know
February 21, 2019 - More States Say Doctors Must Offer Overdose Reversal Drug Along With Opioids
February 21, 2019 - Researchers explore case studies focused on industries that kill more people than employed
February 21, 2019 - Only half of GP practice buildings are fit for purpose
February 21, 2019 - Intense exercise, fasting and hormones can enhance waste-protein removal, study shows
February 21, 2019 - Scientists can monitor brain activity to predict epileptic seizures few minutes in advance
February 21, 2019 - Study quantifies hepatic and intestinal mRNA expression of Ugt isoforms in rats
February 21, 2019 - ‘Apple-Shaped’ Body? ‘Pear-Shaped’? Your Genes May Tell
February 21, 2019 - Can we repair the brain? The promise of stem cell technologies for treating Parkinson’s disease
February 21, 2019 - Trump Plan To Beat HIV Hits Rough Road In Rural America
February 21, 2019 - PENTAX Medical introduces new electrosurgical and argon plasma coagulation platforms
February 21, 2019 - Trump plan to beat HIV hits rough road in rural America
February 21, 2019 - Eating blueberries every day could help decrease blood pressure
February 21, 2019 - ‘No Second Chances’ report calls for new measures to combat cardiovascular disease in Australia
February 21, 2019 - Mayo clinic researchers discuss local case studies of leprosy
February 21, 2019 - Scientists demonstrate key role of salt in allergic immune reactions
February 21, 2019 - Experts propose revising the criteria for diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease
February 21, 2019 - The med student and the machine
February 21, 2019 - Hey, Hey! Ho, Ho! Is Striking For School Nurses The Way To Go?
February 21, 2019 - Latest research encourages children to move out and learn through physical activity
February 21, 2019 - Proper oral hygiene and regular visits to dentist can promote heart health
February 21, 2019 - New, versatile technique for remote control of transplanted cells in Parkinson’s
February 21, 2019 - Why melanoma tumors in the brain may be worse?
February 21, 2019 - New project aims to improve lung disease care in Appalachia
February 21, 2019 - Drug increases melanin production in some people with albinism
February 21, 2019 - Over 1 in 3 adults miss the mark on protein, finds study
February 21, 2019 - CymaBay Therapeutics Announces Seladelpar Granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation by the FDA for the Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis
February 21, 2019 - A correlation between obesity and income has only developed in the past 30 years
Minimally invasive surgery associated with worse survival for women with cervical cancer compared to open hysterectomy

Minimally invasive surgery associated with worse survival for women with cervical cancer compared to open hysterectomy

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print
J. Alejandro Rauh-Hain, M.D. Credit: MD Anderson Cancer Center

When comparing standard-of-care surgical options for women with early-stage cervical cancer, two studies led by researchers at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center discovered that minimally invasive radical hysterectomy is associated with higher recurrence rates and worse overall survival (OS), compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy.

The results of both studies are published today in the New England Journal of Medicine. The first, a randomized-controlled Phase III trial, was led by Pedro Ramirez, M.D., professor, Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine. The second, an epidemiologic study, was led by J. Alejandro Rauh-Hain, M.D., assistant professor, Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine and Health Services Research.

According to the authors, the findings already have changed care at MD Anderson and could impact the surgical management of all women with early-stage disease, which accounts for nearly half of the 13,240 cervical cancers expected to be diagnosed this year.

“Minimally invasive surgery was adopted as an alternative to open radical hysterectomy before high-quality evidence regarding its impact on survival was available,” said Rauh-Hain. “Both Dr. Ramirez and I were surprised to find that in our respective studies, surgical approach negatively affected oncologic outcomes for women with early-stage cervical cancer.”

In the gynecologic oncology community, minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer gained acceptance more than a decade ago as an alternative to abdominal radical hysterectomy when laparoscopy and then robotic technology were introduced. However, impact on survival and other cancer-related outcomes had not been studied in randomized trials or large, well-designed observational studies.

“Until now, data focused primarily on surgical outcomes and the immediate period after, such as the recovery of the patient, length of stay, transfusion needs, and overall return to functional daily activities,” said Ramirez. “Our research is the first to prospectively compare the two surgical approaches and evaluate oncologic outcomes, including disease-free and overall survival and recurrence rates.”

The findings are critical, say the researchers, because cervical cancer is curable with surgery in its earliest stage but treatments are much less effective after disease recurrence.

Phase III clinical trial reports worse outcomes with minimally invasive hysterectomy

In their study, Ramirez and colleagues hypothesized that minimally-invasive radical hysterectomy was equivalent to the open approach in terms of disease-free survival (DFS). The international study was a multi-institutional collaboration with 33 centers worldwide. It opened in 2008 and was designed to randomize 740 women with early-stage (1A or 1B) cervical cancer to undergo either minimally invasive or open radical hysterectomy (1:1 ratio). Patients were equally stratified for risk factors, such as histologic subtypes, tumor size, stage, lymph node involvement, and adjuvant treatment.

In 2017, with 631 patients enrolled, the study was stopped because of a noted safety signal. Women receiving minimally invasive radical hysterectomy were found to have higher rates of recurrences, worse progression-free survival (PFS), and worse OS.

The researchers found:

  • Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with a three-fold increase in disease progression, compared to open radical hysterectomy.
  • The rate of disease-free survival at 4.5 years was 86 percent with a minimally invasive surgery and 96.5 percent with open surgery.
  • The three-year OS overall survival was 91.2 percent in the minimally invasive group compared to 97.1 percent in the open surgery arm.

“Our study reinforces the need for more randomized clinical trials in the field of surgery,” said Ramirez. “Too often, success of a new intervention in surgery is measured by retrospective data. We always need to test and measure our procedures to determine what is best for our patients.”

Pedro Ramirez, M.D., discusses the results of his clinical trial comparing surgical options for women with early-stage cervical cancer. Credit: MD Anderson Cancer Center

The study also highlights the need for further research, said Ramirez. We should consider evaluation of the impact of minimally invasive surgery in other scenarios, like fertility preserving surgery in early-cervical cancer, where such an approach is still commonly used.

Retrospective study reinforces clinical trial findings

Rauh-Hain’s retrospective, epidemiologic study also confirmed that minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with worse OS than abdominal radical hysterectomy among patients with early-stage cervical cancer. The study, performed in collaboration with Harvard, Columbia University, and Northwestern University, includes analysis of data from two large cancer databases to compare survival rates between patients who underwent either of the two surgery types.

The team first analyzed the National Cancer Database (NCDB); this nationwide outcomes registry covers approximately 70 percent of newly diagnosed cancer cases in over 1,500 U.S. hospitals. The secondary analysis reviewed data from the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.

Analysis of the data revealed:

  • Over a 45-month median follow-up, the four-year mortality risks were 9.1 percent among women receiving minimally invasive radical hysterectomy compared to 5.3 percent for abdominal radical hysterectomy.
  • Adoption of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy coincided with the beginning of a decline in four-year relative survival rates of 0.8 percent per year between 2006 and 2010 in this population.

“Our research also found that compared with open surgery, minimally invasive surgery increased the risk of death among women who underwent radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer,” said Rauh-Hain. “Given these two studies, we believe that we can no longer recommend minimally invasive radical hysterectomies for our patients with early-stage cervical cancer.”

An important limitation of the retrospective study is the inability to explain why minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with inferior survival. Additional studies are needed to understand the cause of the survival differences, explained Rauh-Hain.

Overall impact to the field

The findings have impacted care and management of women with early-stage cervical cancer at MD Anderson. These patients are no longer offered minimally invasive radical hysterectomy; only open radical hysterectomy is performed. Trial participants enrolled at MD Anderson and randomized to minimally invasive radical hysterectomy will be considered for closer surveillance at the time of follow up.

The research could impact national treatment guidelines for the management of the disease, say Ramirez and Rauh-Hain.

Both strongly encourage women who have undergone laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy, either on the trial or as part of standard care, to have an informed conversation with their physician regarding the findings of this study, which should include their personal need for monitoring surveillance.

Ramirez and Rauh-Hain both note that their respective findings solely affect the care and management of patients with early-stage cervical cancer. However, the findings could impact fertility-sparing surgeries, such as radical trachelectomy, for women with early-stage cervical cancer, said Ramirez. As follow up, an international multi-institutional registry comparing minimally invasive to open radical trachelectomy is being led by MD Anderson.


Explore further:
Minimally invasive hysterectomy may be underused

More information:
New England Journal of Medicine (2018). dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804923

Journal reference:
New England Journal of Medicine

Provided by:
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles