Breaking News
January 18, 2018 - A new strategy proposed for drug discovery
January 17, 2018 - Lactation May Lower T2D Risk in Younger Women
January 17, 2018 - New Atopic Dermatitis Yardstick provides practical guidance and management insights
January 17, 2018 - New biodegradable pressure sensor could help monitor serious health conditions
January 17, 2018 - HSS orders Sectra’s 3D pre-operative planning solution for improving patient outcomes
January 17, 2018 - Study identifies six new genes regions associated with diabetes
January 17, 2018 - Women do not receive timely diagnosis for heart disease
January 17, 2018 - AbbVie’s Upadacitinib Shows Positive Results as Monotherapy in Phase 3 Rheumatoid Arthritis Study, Meeting All Primary and Key Secondary Endpoints
January 17, 2018 - Should President Trump’s Physical Include a Cognitive Screen?
January 17, 2018 - Could gene therapy someday eliminate HIV?
January 17, 2018 - Researchers identify new anti-inflammatory drug target
January 17, 2018 - Loxo Oncology Initiates Rolling Submission of New Drug Application to U.S. Food and Drug Administration for Larotrectinib for the Treatment of TRK Fusion Cancers
January 17, 2018 - Trunk Imaging Tied to Higher Nephrectomy Risk
January 17, 2018 - Campaigners incensed at failings in Africa AIDS war
January 17, 2018 - Research opens door to development of new treatment for type 2 diabetes
January 17, 2018 - Bariatric surgery extends lifespan in obese patients, shows study
January 17, 2018 - Bristol-Myers Squibb Receives FDA Approval for Opdivo (nivolumab) as Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Completely Resected Melanoma with Lymph Node Involvement or Metastatic Disease
January 17, 2018 - Ewww Moments in the ER: That’s Improbable!
January 17, 2018 - Methods from optogenetics, machine learning should help improve treatment options for stroke patients
January 17, 2018 - Booze may help or harm the heart, but income matters
January 17, 2018 - Three-dimensional organization of genome plays key role in gene expression, cell fate
January 17, 2018 - Scientists identify six new gene regions that may help treat type 1 diabetes
January 17, 2018 - Top nutrients needed to boost mood and energy levels on Blue Monday
January 17, 2018 - Scientists develop unique technique to map elasticity of cell components
January 17, 2018 - Obesity surgery reduces the risk of death by half finds new study
January 17, 2018 - Raw Meat Not the Safest Choice for Your Dog or for You
January 17, 2018 - Men who lack HSD17B4 gene may be more susceptible to treatment-resistant prostate cancer
January 17, 2018 - High-Dose Aspirin Preferred for Kawasaki’s
January 17, 2018 - Study suggests risk management approach to combat EMS fatigue
January 17, 2018 - A new therapy against obesity
January 17, 2018 - Doctors warn against holding your nose and closing your mouth to contain a sneeze
January 17, 2018 - Measles outbreak alarms public health officials
January 17, 2018 - FDA Slaps Class Warning on Gadolinium Contrast Agents
January 17, 2018 - Distinct human mutations can alter the effect of medicine
January 17, 2018 - ASIT biotech’s new article presents clinical results of gp
January 17, 2018 - Alternative tobacco use by adolescents associated with greater odds of future cigarette smoking
January 17, 2018 - A High-Salt Diet Produces Dementia In Mice
January 17, 2018 - Scientists provide insights into crucial interaction for DNA repair
January 17, 2018 - Sanofi and Regeneron Announce Positive Topline Pivotal Results for PD-1 Antibody Cemiplimab in Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
January 17, 2018 - Morning Break: Pfizer Kills AD/PD Pipeline; Trump Affirms His Mental Health; Humira Pricing Strategy
January 17, 2018 - Researchers see gene influencing performance of sleep-deprived people
January 17, 2018 - Fast food triggers the immune system making it hyperactive
January 17, 2018 - Scientists find increased risk of HIV outbreaks in Ukraine due to war-related migration
January 17, 2018 - New universal flu vaccine moves to clinical trial phase and could be a reality soon
January 17, 2018 - Cocaine de-addiction breakthrough shows promise
January 17, 2018 - FDA Accepts New Drug Application for Seysara (sarecycline) for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acne
January 17, 2018 - Robotic Telestenting; BP Cuff Smartwatch; Medicare Bundled Care
January 17, 2018 - New cellular approach found to control progression of chronic kidney disease
January 17, 2018 - Lamprey genes provide clues to repair spinal cord damage, finds study
January 17, 2018 - Tissue-based soft robot could lead to advances in bio-inspired robotics
January 17, 2018 - Mostly the healthy and wealthy Americans use mobile phone apps to track sleep habits
January 17, 2018 - FDA Alert: Varubi (rolapitant) Injectable Emulsion: Health Care Provider Letter
January 16, 2018 - NeuroBreak: Rough Days for Neuroscience Research; Another Migraine Drug Advances
January 16, 2018 - The ‘greatest pandemic in history’ was 100 years ago – but many of us still get the basic facts wrong
January 16, 2018 - Serena Williams Shares Childbirth Ordeal
January 16, 2018 - The Artificial Brain as Doctor
January 16, 2018 - Type 2 diabetes has hepatic origins
January 16, 2018 - Expert discusses how to identify, support individuals with drug or alcohol addiction in workplace
January 16, 2018 - Starting menstruation early increases risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke in later life
January 16, 2018 - CapsoVision receives CE Mark approval for use of CapsoCam Plus System in pediatric patients
January 16, 2018 - Researchers develop new dynamic statistical model to follow gene expressions over time
January 16, 2018 - Alzheimer’s ‘looks like me, it looks like you’
January 16, 2018 - By the Numbers: Physicians’ Economic Impact
January 16, 2018 - Sound Health | NIH News in Health
January 16, 2018 - Modifying baby formula doesn’t prevent type 1 diabetes in children
January 16, 2018 - Energy drinks dangerous for kids
January 16, 2018 - When you need a breast screening, should you get a 3-D mammogram?
January 16, 2018 - Johns Hopkins gets approval to perform HIV positive to HIV positive living donor kidney transplants
January 16, 2018 - The Salk Institute and Indivumed collaborate for cutting-edge cancer research
January 16, 2018 - Study reveals negative long-term effects of heavy cannabis use on brain function and behavior
January 16, 2018 - Many gym-goers injure themselves by pushing harder to be better than friends
January 16, 2018 - Risankizumab Meets All Primary Endpoints Reporting Positive Results in Fourth Pivotal Phase 3 Psoriasis Study
January 16, 2018 - Federal Junk Food Tax Feasible, Study Says
January 16, 2018 - Do girls have stronger teeth than boys?
January 16, 2018 - New high-sensitivity blood tests could aid faster diagnosis and treatment for heart attack
January 16, 2018 - How fatal mitochondrial diseases may strike offspring of families with no history of the conditions
January 16, 2018 - TherapeuticsMD Announces FDA Acceptance of New Drug Application and Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) Date for TX-004HR
January 16, 2018 - Morning Break: Food Pharmacies; Obamacare Sign-ups Dip; Top Pot Studies
January 16, 2018 - Blood pressure declines 14 to 18 years before death
January 16, 2018 - ViLim Ball technology helps reduce uncontrollable shaking hands
Penny-wise, pound-foolish decisions explained by neurons’ firing

Penny-wise, pound-foolish decisions explained by neurons’ firing

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

The British have a pithy way of describing people who dither over spending 20 cents more for premium ice cream but happily drop an extra $5,000 for a fancier house: penny wise and pound foolish.

Now, a new study suggests that being penny wise and pound foolish is not so much a failure of judgment as it is a function of how our brains tally the value of objects that vary widely in worth.

Researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have found that when monkeys are faced with a choice between two options, the firing of neurons activated in the brain adjusts to reflect the enormity of the decision. Such an approach would explain why the same person can see 20 cents as a lot one moment and $5,000 as a little the next, the researchers said.

“Everybody recognizes this behavior, because everybody does it,” said senior author Camillo Padoa-Schioppa, an associate professor of neuroscience, of economics in Arts & Sciences and of biomedical engineering in the School of Engineering & Applied Science. “This paper explains where those judgments originate. The same neural circuit underlies decisions that range from a few dollars to hundreds of thousands of dollars. We found that a system that adapts to the range of values ensures maximal payoff.”

The study is available online in Nature Communications.

While you are contemplating whether to order a scoop of vanilla or strawberry ice cream, a part of your brain just above the eyes is very busy. Brain scans have shown that blood flow to a brain area known as the orbitofrontal cortex increases as people weigh their options.

Neurons in this part of the brain also become active when a monkey is faced with a choice. As the animal tries to decide between a sip of, say, apple juice or grape juice, two sets of neurons in its orbitofrontal cortex fire off electrical pulses. One set reflects how much the monkey wants apple juice; the other set corresponds to the animal’s interest in grape juice. The faster the neurons fire, the more highly the monkey values that option.

A similar process likely occurs as people make decisions, the researchers said. But what happens to firing rates when a person stops thinking about ice cream and starts thinking about houses? A house might be hundreds of thousands of times more valuable than a cup of ice cream, but neurons cannot fire pulses 100,000 times faster. The speed at which they can fire maxes out at about 500 spikes per second.

To find out how neurons cope with different values, Padoa-Schioppa and colleagues repeatedly gave monkeys a choice between two juices, offered in the range of 0 to 2 drops. After a break, the same two juices were offered in the range of 0 to 10 drops. The researchers recorded which neurons were active—and how quickly they were firing—as the monkeys made their choices.

The researchers discovered that the neurons’ firing rates reset between the two sessions. In the first session, the maximum firing rate corresponded to the option of two drops of juice, and in the second it corresponded to 10 drops of juice. In other words, the same change in how rapidly the neuron fired corresponded to a fine distinction in value when the range was narrow, and a coarse distinction when the range was broad.

“As we adapt to large values, we lose some ability to consider smaller values,” Padoa-Schioppa said. “This is why salesmen try so hard to sell you upgrades when you’re buying a car. Spending $100 to add on a radio seems like no big deal if you’re already spending $20,000 on a car. But if you already have a car and you are thinking of spending $100 for a radio, suddenly it seems like a lot. They know that people don’t come back and buy the radio later.”

While having adaptable neurons allows us effectively to shop for items ranging in value from groceries to cars to houses, it does introduce a theoretical quirk: It should be possible to change someone’s preferences simply by adjusting the range of each option. For example, by offering a large range of apple juice and a small range of grape juice, the researchers could make a drop of apple juice look less valuable than a drop of grape juice, convincing an apple-loving monkey to select grape juice instead.

When they changed the ranges of the juices, however, the researchers found that the monkeys did not fall for it. Apple-loving monkeys continued to choose apple juice.

The researchers concluded that making a choice between two juices is not a simple matter of comparing the firing rates of the apple-juice neurons to the firing rates of the grape-juice neurons. Instead, neurons pegged to each option feed into a neural circuit that processes the data and corrects for differences in scale.

It’s a system optimized for making the best possible choice—the one that reflects true preferences over a vast range of values, even though some detail gets lost at the higher end.

“It was a puzzle: How does the brain handle this enormous variability?” Padoa-Schioppa said. “We showed that a circuit that has adaptation and corrects for it ensures maximal payoff. And these findings have implications for understanding why people make the choices they do. There’s a good neurological reason for behavior that might seem illogical.”


Explore further:
Small brain area plays key role in making everyday decisions

More information:
Aldo Rustichini et al. Optimal coding and neuronal adaptation in economic decisions, Nature Communications (2017). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01373-y

Journal reference:
Nature Communications

Provided by:
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles