Breaking News
December 12, 2017 - Novel approach could limit common complications of immunotherapy
December 12, 2017 - CAR T cell therapy shows long-lasting remissions in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients
December 12, 2017 - Live-cell microscopy reveals internal forces that direct cell migration
December 12, 2017 - GSK Submits US Regulatory Application for Single-Dose Tafenoquine for Plasmodium vivax Malaria
December 12, 2017 - High Blood Urea Nitrogen Levels Tied to T2D Risk
December 12, 2017 - Blood Smear: MedlinePlus Lab Test Information
December 12, 2017 - Atopic eczema—one size does not fit all
December 12, 2017 - Biological Applications of AFM
December 12, 2017 - Genentech researchers uncover epigenetic regulator of pancreatic cancer cells
December 12, 2017 - Study provides new insights into mechanism of tumor survival in glioblastoma
December 12, 2017 - FDA Approves Admelog (insulin lispro) Short-Acting “Follow-On” Insulin Product to Treat Diabetes
December 12, 2017 - Chromosomes Fact Sheet – National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
December 12, 2017 - Discovery puts the brakes on HIV’s ability to infect
December 12, 2017 - Researchers uncover novel strategy to program immune system for fighting cancer
December 12, 2017 - Study finds under-age marriage for women as marker of multiple vulnerabilities
December 12, 2017 - Scientists discover specific mechanism of Zika virus-associated microcephaly
December 12, 2017 - Creating Your Family Health Tree
December 12, 2017 - Biological Pathways Fact Sheet – National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
December 12, 2017 - LSUHealthNO breakthrough may pave way for advances in obesity-related diseases
December 12, 2017 - Few people with HIV get prompt care after incarceration
December 11, 2017 - Air pollution exposure before or after conception linked to increased risk of birth defects in children
December 11, 2017 - Abu Dhabi focuses on reducing childhood obesity
December 11, 2017 - Employees with influenza have more lost work time
December 11, 2017 - type 2 diabetes – Genetics Home Reference
December 11, 2017 - Insufficient evidence to guide recommendations on vitamin D in pregnancy
December 11, 2017 - St. Jude gene therapy offers hope for infants with ‘bubble boy’ disease
December 11, 2017 - Soy foods, cruciferous vegetables may reduce breast cancer treatment’s side effects
December 11, 2017 - Nearly 3 in 10 elite footballers at top clubs have undetected lung and airway problems, study finds
December 11, 2017 - Why some workers can’t call it quits
December 11, 2017 - Healthier Diet, Less Salt: The Recipe to Beat High Blood Pressure: MedlinePlus Health News
December 11, 2017 - Research leads to call for lung health screening at top football clubs
December 11, 2017 - Drug improves disease-free, overall survival after hematopoietic stem cell transplants
December 11, 2017 - Researchers generate 3D cell cultures to investigate mechanisms of drug resistance in breast cancer
December 11, 2017 - New, more easily administered therapies offer benefits for bleeding and clotting disorders
December 11, 2017 - Opioids after surgery left her addicted. Is that a medical error?
December 11, 2017 - Scientists develop software that predicts leukemia-specific immune targets
December 11, 2017 - Does Your Pet Have a Weight Problem? Here’s How to Tell: MedlinePlus Health News
December 11, 2017 - Genetic variant prompts cells to store fat, fueling obesity
December 11, 2017 - Canola oil linked to worsening of Alzheimer’s
December 11, 2017 - New Breast Cancer Drug Ribociclib (Kisqali) May Benefit Younger Women, Too
December 11, 2017 - Healthy Living May Ease Some MS Symptoms: MedlinePlus Health News
December 11, 2017 - Researchers develop a molecular taxonomy for hair disorders
December 11, 2017 - Study shows safety, efficacy of cystic fibrosis drug in children between 1 to 2 years of age
December 11, 2017 - Two immunotherapy approaches for multiple myeloma show hope
December 11, 2017 - The Valley Hospital uses novel mobile app to enhance pre-hospital emergency care
December 11, 2017 - ‘I Entered Medical School Through a Hunger Strike’: What We Heard This Week
December 11, 2017 - Research team unlocks secrets of Ebola
December 11, 2017 - Generic versions of Viagra coming this week
December 11, 2017 - New genetic model identified for predicting outcomes in patients with primary myelofibrosis
December 11, 2017 - Research shows that e-cigarettes serve as gateway to traditional smoking
December 11, 2017 - A risk factor for drug-induced skin disease identified
December 11, 2017 - MIT researchers discover new way to make bacteria vulnerable to existing antibiotics
December 11, 2017 - Dengue vaccine issues in the Philippines
December 11, 2017 - Office Workers Don’t Like Being Chained to Their Desks: MedlinePlus Health News
December 11, 2017 - Study reveals how a very low calorie diet can reverse type 2 diabetes
December 11, 2017 - Study highlights potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in health care settings
December 11, 2017 - University of Adelaide receives $23.2 million for preterm birth research
December 11, 2017 - Tough Flu Season Ahead: Vaccine May Only Be 10% Effective
December 11, 2017 - Getting Self-Driving Cars on the Road Soon Might Save Lives: MedlinePlus Health News
December 11, 2017 - Enterovirus vaccine prevents virus-induced diabetes in a T1D experimental model
December 11, 2017 - Solar retinopathy or sun damage to the eyes – a case report
December 11, 2017 - Cancer risk with birth control pills emerges again in latest study
December 10, 2017 - Deer Hunters: Put Safety First: MedlinePlus Health News
December 10, 2017 - High blood pressure is redefined as 130, not 140: US guidelines (Update)
December 10, 2017 - Unusual neuroinflammation may underlie cognitive problems in cART-treated HIV patients
December 10, 2017 - Racial differences in parents’ reports of child’s autism symptoms may contribute to delayed diagnosis
December 10, 2017 - Taurine could boost effectiveness of existing multiple sclerosis therapies
December 10, 2017 - The man with a young woman’s heart
December 10, 2017 - Patient bedside remains important component of medical education for students
December 10, 2017 - Nutrition labeling has little impact on sodium consumption
December 10, 2017 - ‘Obesity paradox’ not present among people with new cases of cardiovascular disease
December 10, 2017 - SLU scientists provide promising approach in designing new drugs for DMD
December 10, 2017 - Can PD-1 Inhibitor Help Eradicate HIV?
December 10, 2017 - Checking Prices for Medical Procedures Online? Good Luck: MedlinePlus Health News
December 10, 2017 - Researchers find bacteria tied to esophageal cancer
December 10, 2017 - Boy’s Double Hand Transplant Changed His Brain
December 10, 2017 - Memo to Doctors: Spit Out the Bad News: MedlinePlus Health News
December 10, 2017 - Two years of extended anastrozole therapy proved as effective as five years in clinical trial
December 10, 2017 - Using digital devices before bed may contribute to sleep and nutrition problems in children
December 10, 2017 - Are You Sure That’s What the Doctor Said About Your Leukemia?: MedlinePlus Health News
Experts explain why lead found in fidget spinners is no idle threat

Experts explain why lead found in fidget spinners is no idle threat

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print

That fidget spinner your kid can’t put down? It turns out it may be putting children at risk for lead exposure.

That’s according to a report out Thursday from a consumer advocacy group, the U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund.

The organization tested the toys — which represent the latest iteration of a long line of skill-based amusements that include yo-yos and spinning tops — for lead.

At least two of about 12 models — products called Fidget Wild Premium Spinner Brass and Fidget Wild Premium Spinner Metal — were found to contain levels of lead that are unsafe for children, said Dev Gowda, a PIRG public health advocate who co-authored the report.

U.S. PIRG found the devices to have lead on their surface level and the layer immediately beneath.

Preventing lead exposure, especially for young children, is considered a public health imperative. It can impair brain development, especially in younger children, and have lifelong consequences.

Flint, Mich., for instance, made national headlines when lead was discovered in its public water system. The problem is also often associated with paint in old buildings.

Could a kid’s toy really be the next culprit?

Bulls i Toy, which makes the two models, said in a letter to U.S. PIRG that the spinners are marketed toward people 14 and up, and therefore exempt from federal regulations about lead in toys. Target, which sells them, has no plans to stop. It also argued that the “14 and up” distinction makes these general-use toys, not meant for kids.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, which comes up with safety standards for consumer products, also treats fidget spinners as “general use,” unless the company has specified they are for kids 12 and under. Children’s toys, unlike general use ones, are held to tougher lead-level standards.

Consumer advocates are disputing that “general use” classification.

In the meantime, though, consumers need answers. How big a problem is this? Should parents be worried about kids who have fidget spinners? Should the toys be scratched off Christmas lists?

Kaiser Health News spoke with two lead experts: Jerome Paulson, an emeritus professor and pediatrician at George Washington University, and Ellen Silbergeld, environmental health professor at Johns Hopkins University. It turns out the answers are not necessarily clear or easy.

Q: There are countless brands of fidget spinners out there, and we’re just hearing about two of them. Is this a serious concern?

Paulson: Is this one batch? Is this 10 million fidget spinners? I don’t know. Just touching them with kids’ hands is not going to be an issue. That doesn’t go through the skin. But if this lead is on the surface of the fidget spinner, and therefore gets on the fingers of the kids, and the kids put the fingers in the mouth or put the toys in their mouth — then, clearly, there is a pathway of exposure, and they shouldn’t be in the hands of the kids.

It’s just impossible to know — I certainly would not go running every kid who’s got a fidget spinner to the doctor until we’ve got a better sense of how widespread this issue is.

Silbergeld: This is indeed a hazard that is of considerable concern. If this [lead] were buried inside, it would not rise to the level of concern. But given that it is, in fact, a layer — a coating — then, of course, it’s right there.

My sense would be just to avoid fidget spinners altogether [until the CPSC tests them for lead]. I think that would be a prudent thing to do.

Q: Say I have a child who wants a fidget spinner. Would this put him or her at risk?

Paulson: There is no lead level that is safe, so we don’t want kids exposed to lead at any level. We’re more concerned about younger kids, because their brains are less finished, if you will. I understand these are ostensibly made for older kids … but that’s a distinction without a difference. The manufacturer and the sellers are fooling themselves if they think these won’t get into the hands of younger kids.

Lead is toxic for adults, too. If you’re one of the adults who chews on your pen, don’t chew on your fidget spinner. You could be lead-poisoned, just like your kid could be.

Silbergeld: It would probably be important to talk about the age of the child and what is the experience of the child. Do they put things in their mouth or not?

I’m going to make a recommendation because I think it has a generally good basis for it, and I would say people should get their children tested for lead.

If you haven’t had your child tested for lead at any point, this is a good time to start.

Q: What should I do if my child already has one of these? Throw it away?

Paulson: I don’t think I’d be very concerned. If parents want to check, there are these lead check kits that can be purchased at stores like Home Depot. They will reveal if there are high levels of lead on the surface of a toy. If it’s a hazard, it should be taken back and handled as hazardous waste — not just thrown in the garbage.

Silbergeld: If there is a determination that lead is present in this object in a way that it could result in exposure, then if parents have these things, they should throw them away.

If there is a determination that lead is present in this object in a way that it could result in exposure, then if parents have these things, they should throw them away. … This is quite wise and not hysterical, and is the sort of thing that makes the industry go crazy.

This is why we have these bans on toys. … This is not an unknown message.

Q: What about other toys? Is this a widespread problem?

Paulson: Every once in a while, this [issue of lead in toys] rears its ugly head again. Sometimes it’s manufacturers not paying attention to regulations they need to. It sounds like they’re paying attention to a regulation — but when you think about it, it’s not protecting the kid. You can say this is for kids 14 and older, not 6, and therefore doesn’t need to comply. But the reality is, we know younger kids are going to get exposed to it.

Silbergeld: Your best bet is to buy toys made in the United States because, frankly … American toy manufacturers are totally understanding of and compliant with making products that do not contain lead.

We can’t be totally confident in anything. But I think parents would be advised to get toys that are made in America.

KHN’s coverage of children’s health care issues is supported in part by a grant from The Heising-Simons Foundation.


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles