Breaking News
August 20, 2018 - Health Tip: Keep Diabetic Feet Healthier
August 20, 2018 - FDA approves brain stimulation device for OCD
August 20, 2018 - NYU Langone’s Perlmutter Cancer Center expands Blood and Marrow Transplant Program
August 20, 2018 - New drug shows potential to prevent painful side effect of therapy
August 20, 2018 - Illicit drug use is higher during celebratory events, may be worse than previously thought
August 20, 2018 - Exploring the relationship between fever and cancer incidence
August 20, 2018 - Study reveals how socioeconomic status affects racial, ethnic disparities in childhood cancer survival
August 20, 2018 - Brain tumors trap immune cells needed to fight cancer in the bone marrow, finds research
August 20, 2018 - Three factors that contribute to physician burnout
August 20, 2018 - Babies dependent on opioids need touch, not tech
August 20, 2018 - Understanding How Antibodies Shape the Gut Microbiome
August 20, 2018 - Cara Therapeutics Doses First Patient in Second Pivotal Phase 3 Efficacy Trial of Korsuva (CR845/difelikefalin) Injection in Hemodialysis Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Pruritus
August 20, 2018 - Kidney transplant chains more effective in saving lives
August 20, 2018 - Study unravels cellular and molecular mechanisms behind dermal condensate formation
August 20, 2018 - New integrated gene logic-chips could have great value in medical care
August 20, 2018 - FDA Advisory Committee Recommends Approval of Paratek’s Omadacycline
August 20, 2018 - Total, open repairs decline for abdominal aortic aneurysms
August 20, 2018 - Novel system can pinpoint ingestible implants inside the body using wireless signals
August 20, 2018 - Infection rates of high risk oral HPV in England found to be lower than expected
August 20, 2018 - Making robots as valuable and trustworthy assistants for medical therapies
August 20, 2018 - Patients with low-risk blood clots can be better treated at home than at hospital
August 20, 2018 - Passive smoking exposure among kids greatly increases COPD risk late in life
August 20, 2018 - Primary Care Provider Burnout Rate Low in Small Practices
August 20, 2018 - Discovery presents treatment hope for Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases
August 20, 2018 - Stroke patients appear to receive better care at teaching hospitals with less chance of readmission
August 20, 2018 - Distinct origin of ADHD identified In children with history of traumatic brain injury
August 20, 2018 - AHA: Wildfire Smoke Threatens Health of Those Near and Far
August 20, 2018 - Here’s a mental health workout that’s as simple as ABC
August 20, 2018 - Newly discovered cytoskeleton utilized by cancer cells for survival
August 19, 2018 - Bifidobacteria supplement colonizes gut of breastfed infants
August 19, 2018 - Why patients with Alzheimer’s markers never develop the condition
August 19, 2018 - ACA’s Medicaid expansion associated with increase in prescriptions for opioid use disorder treatment
August 19, 2018 - Important factor may be missing in models used to predict spread of epidemics from climate change
August 19, 2018 - Indian-Americans have fewer sudden infant deaths, study finds
August 19, 2018 - Experts advise against universal genomic screening of newborns
August 19, 2018 - New trial to investigate whether weight loss before conception can make mom and baby healthier
August 19, 2018 - Sun Pharma Announces FDA Approval of Cequa (cyclosporine) Ophthalmic Solution to Treat Dry Eye Disease
August 19, 2018 - Researchers examining Parkinson’s resilience
August 19, 2018 - HPI, INTEGRIS and USPI enter into agreement to offer patients more choice, flexibility of care
August 19, 2018 - Researchers find mechanism that prepares brain to replicate repeated actions
August 19, 2018 - Those who are emotionally stable when young may remain the most stable as they age
August 19, 2018 - URI professor develops simpler and quicker method for detecting impurity in heparin
August 19, 2018 - Mayo Medical Laboratories and NDSC collaborate to develop new patient blood-management solution
August 19, 2018 - Insight into endocrine cancers and treatment options
August 19, 2018 - HPV Legislation Doesn’t Impact Teen Sexual Behaviors
August 19, 2018 - Exenatide treatment alleviated symptoms of depression in patients
August 19, 2018 - Tufts researchers win grant to study integration of genomic sequencing into neonatal care
August 19, 2018 - Novel finger-prick test can help prevent toxoplasmosis
August 19, 2018 - Cosmetic Procedures Boost Well-Being, Poll Shows
August 19, 2018 - Responsive parenting intervention results in lower BMIs through age three
August 19, 2018 - Anticancer drugs can help plants to battle infection
August 19, 2018 - Sunscreen from bathers releases significant quantities of polluting titanium dioxide into the sea
August 19, 2018 - Case Western Reserve gets three-year grant to enhance food systems in Cleveland neighborhoods
August 19, 2018 - Teenagers can thank their parents’ positive attitude for avoiding obesity
August 19, 2018 - Body mass index positively linked with blood pressure
August 19, 2018 - New tool fills gap in Small Molecules market
August 19, 2018 - Study compares survival outcomes in rural and urban cancer patients enrolled in clinical trials
August 19, 2018 - Researchers develop molecular matrix that delivers healing stem cells to injured elderly muscles
August 19, 2018 - Teva and Regeneron Announce Positive Topline Phase 3 Fasinumab Results in Patients with Chronic Pain from Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip
August 19, 2018 - New study pinpoints ways to improve quality of food and nutrition research
August 19, 2018 - Ology Bioservices wins $8.4 million worth agreement to manufacture anti-Ebola monoclonal antibody
August 19, 2018 - New CRISPR technology may help eliminate mutated gene sequence
August 19, 2018 - “Zombie gene” protects elephants from cancer finds study
August 19, 2018 - Study explores how many American cities protect the rights of employed breastfeeding mothers
August 19, 2018 - FDA Approves Lenvima (lenvatinib) for First-line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
August 19, 2018 - Pain: Considering Complementary Approaches (eBook)
August 19, 2018 - Autoimmune response drives vision loss in glaucoma
August 19, 2018 - Tandem Diabetes Care introduces t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Basal-IQ Technology in the US
August 19, 2018 - Innovative platform developed to destroy cancer cells
August 19, 2018 - Lowering pH inside tumor cells can slow down spread of cancer
August 19, 2018 - Biomarker predicts kidney cancer risk years before diagnosis
August 19, 2018 - Consequences of healthcare-associated infections go beyond patients’ physical health
August 19, 2018 - New drug- free, nanotechnology-based method detects and treats oral plaque
August 19, 2018 - Integration of Opioid, Infectious Disease Treatment Needed
August 19, 2018 - How eye disorders may have influenced the work of famous painters
August 18, 2018 - Blood biomarker could help predict kidney cancer up to five years prior to diagnosis
August 18, 2018 - Dartmouth scientists create more sustainable feed for aquaculture
August 18, 2018 - Immigrants Not a Burden on U.S. Health Care: Study
August 18, 2018 - Women who eat fast food take longer to become pregnant
August 18, 2018 - Most YouTube videos on plastic surgery are misleading marketing campaigns
The ‘greatest pandemic in history’ was 100 years ago – but many of us still get the basic facts wrong

The ‘greatest pandemic in history’ was 100 years ago – but many of us still get the basic facts wrong

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print
Patients receive care for the Spanish flu at Walter Reed Military Hospital, in Washington, D.C. Credit: origins.osu.edu

This year marks the 100th anniversary of the great influenza pandemic of 1918. Between 50 and 100 million people are thought to have died, representing as much as 5 percent of the world’s population. Half a billion people were infected.

Especially remarkable was the 1918 flu’s predilection for taking the lives of otherwise healthy young adults, as opposed to children and the elderly, who usually suffer most. Some have called it the greatest pandemic in history.

The 1918 flu pandemic has been a regular subject of speculation over the last century. Historians and scientists have advanced numerous hypotheses regarding its origin, spread and consequences. As a result, many of us harbor misconceptions about it.

By correcting these 10 myths, we can better understand what actually happened and learn how to prevent and mitigate such disasters in the future.

1. The pandemic originated in Spain

No one believes the so-called “Spanish flu” originated in Spain.

The pandemic likely acquired this nickname because of World War I, which was in full swing at the time. The major countries involved in the war were keen to avoid encouraging their enemies, so reports of the extent of the flu were suppressed in Germany, Austria, France, the United Kingdom and the U.S. By contrast, neutral Spain had no need to keep the flu under wraps. That created the false impression that Spain was bearing the brunt of the disease.

In fact, the geographic origin of the flu is debated to this day, though hypotheses have suggested East Asia, Europe and even Kansas.

2. The pandemic was the work of a ‘super-virus’

The 1918 flu spread rapidly, killing 25 million people in just the first six months. This led some to fear the end of mankind, and has long fueled the supposition that the strain of influenza was particularly lethal.

However, more recent study suggests that the virus itself, though more lethal than other strains, was not fundamentally different from those that caused epidemics in other years.

Much of the high death rate can be attributed to crowding in military camps and urban environments, as well as poor nutrition and sanitation, which suffered during wartime. It’s now thought that many of the deaths were due to the development of bacterial pneumonias in lungs weakened by influenza.

3. The first wave of the pandemic was most lethal

Actually, the initial wave of deaths from the pandemic in the first half of 1918 was relatively low.

It was in the second wave, from October through December of that year, that the highest death rates were observed. A third wave in spring of 1919 was more lethal than the first but less so than the second.

Scientists now believe that the marked increase in deaths in the second wave was caused by conditions that favored the spread of a deadlier strain. People with mild cases stayed home, but those with severe cases were often crowded together in hospitals and camps, increasing transmission of a more lethal form of the virus.

4. The virus killed most people who were infected with it

In fact, the vast majority of the people who contracted the 1918 flu survived. National death rates among the infected generally did not exceed 20 percent.

However, death rates varied among different groups. In the U.S., deaths were particularly high among Native American populations, perhaps due to lower rates of exposure to past strains of influenza. In some cases, entire Native communities were wiped out.

Of course, even a 20 percent death rate vastly exceeds a typical flu, which kills less than one percent of those infected.

5. Therapies of the day had little impact on the disease

No specific anti-viral therapies were available during the 1918 flu. That’s still largely true today, where most medical care for the flu aims to support patients, rather than cure them.

One hypothesis suggests that many flu deaths could actually be attributed to aspirin poisoning. Medical authorities at the time recommended large doses of aspirin of up to 30 grams per day. Today, about four grams would be considered the maximum safe daily dose. Large doses of aspirin can lead to many of the pandemic’s symptoms, including bleeding.

However, death rates seem to have been equally high in some places in the world where aspirin was not so readily available, so the debate continues.

6. The pandemic dominated the day’s news

Public health officials, law enforcement officers and politicians had reasons to underplay the severity of the 1918 flu, which resulted in less coverage in the press. In addition to the fear that full disclosure might embolden enemies during wartime, they wanted to preserve public order and avoid panic.

However, officials did respond. At the height of the pandemic, quarantines were instituted in many cities. Some were forced to restrict essential services, including police and fire.

7. The pandemic changed the course of World War I

It’s unlikely that the flu changed the outcome of World War I, because combatants on both sides of the battlefield were relatively equally affected.

However, there is little doubt that the war profoundly influenced the course of the pandemic. Concentrating millions of troops created ideal circumstances for the development of more aggressive strains of the virus and its spread around the globe.

8. Widespread immunization ended the pandemic

Immunization against the flu as we know it today was not practiced in 1918, and thus played no role in ending the pandemic.

Exposure to prior strains of the flu may have offered some protection. For example, soldiers who had served in the military for years suffered lower rates of death than new recruits.

In addition, the rapidly mutating virus likely evolved over time into less lethal strains. This is predicted by models of natural selection. Because highly lethal strains kill their host rapidly, they cannot spread as easily as less lethal strains.

9. The genes of the virus have never been sequenced

In 2005, researchers announced that they had successfully determined the gene sequence of the 1918 influenza virus. The virus was recovered from the body of a flu victim buried in the permafrost of Alaska, as well as from samples of American soldiers who fell ill at the time.

Two years later, monkeys infected with the virus were found to exhibit the symptoms observed during the pandemic. Studies suggest that the monkeys died when their immune systems overreacted to the virus, a so-called “cytokine storm.” Scientists now believe that a similar immune system overreaction contributed to high death rates among otherwise healthy young adults in 1918.

10. The 1918 pandemic offers few lessons for 2018

Severe influenza epidemics tend to occur every few decades. Experts believe that the next one is a question not of “if” but “when.”

While few living people can recall the great flu pandemic of 1918, we can continue to learn its lessons, which range from the commonsense value of handwashing and immunizations to the potential of anti-viral drugs. Today we know more about how to isolate and handle large numbers of ill and dying patients, and we can prescribe antibiotics, not available in 1918, to combat secondary bacterial infections. Perhaps the best hope lies in improving nutrition, sanitation and standards of living, which render patients better able to resist the infection.

For the foreseeable future, flu epidemics will remain an annual feature of the rhythm of human life. As a society, we can only hope that we have learned the great pandemic’s lessons sufficiently well to quell another such worldwide catastrophe.


Explore further:
The mystery of a 1918 veteran and the flu pandemic

Provided by:
The Conversation

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles