Breaking News
May 26, 2018 - Mice remain slim on burger diet
May 26, 2018 - BMC receives $13.5 million award to test methods for delivering childhood anxiety treatment
May 26, 2018 - ‘Right to Try Act’ will not benefit terminally-ill patients
May 26, 2018 - Study reveals novel statistical algorithm to identify potential disease genes
May 26, 2018 - Two genes play vital roles in malignant brain cancer
May 26, 2018 - Study explores link between groundwater lithium and diagnoses of bipolar disorder, dementia
May 26, 2018 - Researchers reveal stimulatory effects of myelin on young neural cells
May 26, 2018 - Small part of cellular protein that helps form long-term memories also drives neurodegeneration
May 26, 2018 - Four-legged friends can have heart issues, too
May 26, 2018 - Scientists create small, self-contained spaces inside mammalian cells
May 26, 2018 - Better Social Support Network Protects Black Men Against HIV
May 26, 2018 - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
May 26, 2018 - Burnout, depression can affect ophthalmology residents, study finds
May 26, 2018 - Latinos and African Americans more likely to experience serious depression than Whites
May 26, 2018 - Data from past epidemic could help improve response to future Ebola outbreaks
May 26, 2018 - Researchers provide insight into how the memory molecule limits brain plasticity
May 26, 2018 - OSU biologist describes ‘restoration ecology’ approach toward patient health
May 26, 2018 - New approach to study brown fat could aid in finding treatments for obesity
May 26, 2018 - Could More Fish in the Diet Boost Sex Lives and Fertility?
May 26, 2018 - NTU Singapore and SERI invent new scope to diagnose glaucoma
May 26, 2018 - Cancer cells co-opt pain-sensing ‘neural channel’ to increase tolerance against oxidative stress
May 26, 2018 - Study uncovers why pesticide exposure increases Parkinson’s disease risk in some people
May 26, 2018 - Study finds link between lead exposure and fertility rates
May 26, 2018 - Delivery of standardized diabetes care could help achieve equitable health outcomes for all patients
May 26, 2018 - FDA authorizes marketing of OsteoDetect software for detecting wrist fractures
May 26, 2018 - Children and adolescents growing up in extreme societal conditions more likely to resort to violence
May 26, 2018 - New study puts forth most comprehensive tree of life for malaria parasites
May 26, 2018 - Princeton Instruments and C-SOPS announce collaboration on innovative pharmaceutical technology
May 26, 2018 - New research shows why babies need to move in the womb
May 26, 2018 - UK steps forward to tackle global antimicrobial resistance
May 26, 2018 - CRISPR-Cas9-based strategy allows researchers to precisely alter hundreds of different genes
May 26, 2018 - Novoheart announces next generation of ‘Human heart-in-a-jar’ technology for advanced drug discovery
May 26, 2018 - UT Southwestern-led researchers find new way to determine prognosis of invasive kidney cancer
May 26, 2018 - Researchers develop film to prevent bacteria from growing on dental retainers and aligners
May 26, 2018 - Mobile health intervention for people with serious mental illness as effective as clinic-based treatment
May 26, 2018 - Vaginal estradiol tablets outperform moisturizers when treating vulvovaginal problems
May 26, 2018 - Researchers call for new genetic tests for congenital diseases
May 26, 2018 - KHN’s ‘What the Health?’ Campaign promises kept, plus ‘nerd reports’
May 26, 2018 - AARDA collaborates with Allegheny Health Network and new AHN Autoimmunity Institute
May 26, 2018 - Lung-on-a-chip technology could streamline drug-testing for pulmonary fibrosis
May 26, 2018 - Researchers work together to solve mystery of motor neuron death in ALS patients
May 26, 2018 - Study finds early antibiotic initiation for majority of premature infants
May 26, 2018 - New environmental monitoring project finds increased numbers of deer ticks in Southern Indiana
May 26, 2018 - Pediatricians Should Advocate for Life Support Training
May 26, 2018 - Cannabidiol significantly reduces seizures in patients with severe form of epilepsy
May 26, 2018 - Allergies can have serious, far-reaching consequences on adolescents
May 26, 2018 - Scientists develop lab-based system to study mechanisms of common liver disease
May 25, 2018 - New guidelines may help pathologists to more accurately classify and diagnose invasive melanoma
May 25, 2018 - Immune cells promote lung cancer metastases by forming clots in tumors, study finds
May 25, 2018 - Can Excess Weight in Toddlers Cause Brain Drain?
May 25, 2018 - Studying insight
May 25, 2018 - Researchers reveal potent new mechanism of action for treatment of IBD
May 25, 2018 - Study shows lack of follow-up care for patients with concussion
May 25, 2018 - Study establishes the importance of haploid cells
May 25, 2018 - Coveted BMJ award bestowed on The Clatterbridge Cancer Center
May 25, 2018 - AACN outlines evidence-based protocols and clinical strategies to manage alarms
May 25, 2018 - Origami inspires researchers to develop new solution for tissue regeneration
May 25, 2018 - Melorheostosis – Genetics Home Reference
May 25, 2018 - Non-addictive pain medication changing therapy for substance use disorders
May 25, 2018 - Delayed lactate measurements in sepsis patients increase risk of in-hospital death
May 25, 2018 - Researchers identify novel epigenetic mutations as cause of neurodevelopmental, congenital disorders
May 25, 2018 - UD researchers examine connection between DNA replication in HPV and cancer
May 25, 2018 - Researchers identify neurons that play key role in aggressive behavior
May 25, 2018 - Snail’s eye inspires new type of RIOCATH urinary catheter
May 25, 2018 - Russian researchers develop high-tech device-transformer for ultrasound examination
May 25, 2018 - Researchers discover unexpected chemosensor pathway for predator odor-evoked innate fear behaviors
May 25, 2018 - Researchers build 3-D printer that offers sweet solution to making detailed structures
May 25, 2018 - Nearly one in three people know someone addicted to opioids
May 25, 2018 - Research suggests link between faulty gene, alcohol, and heart failure
May 25, 2018 - New findings could help fine-tune treatment for cancer patients
May 25, 2018 - New cancer treatment approach targets specific sugar receptors
May 25, 2018 - Skin responsible for uptake of cancer-causing compounds during barbecuing than lungs
May 25, 2018 - Early-onset cannabis use linked to further drug abuse problems
May 25, 2018 - Covered California takes aim at hospital C-section rates
May 25, 2018 - FDA Approves Palynziq (pegvaliase-pqpz) for the Treatment of Adults with Phenylketonuria
May 25, 2018 - Arthritis Glossary
May 25, 2018 - Study links breast cancer to the body’s internal clock
May 25, 2018 - Strenuous exercise in teenage years may protect against height loss later in life
May 25, 2018 - FDA approves novel enzyme therapy for adults with rare and serious genetic disease
May 25, 2018 - New research project aims at developing effective interventions for kids with DLD
The ‘greatest pandemic in history’ was 100 years ago – but many of us still get the basic facts wrong

The ‘greatest pandemic in history’ was 100 years ago – but many of us still get the basic facts wrong

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print
Patients receive care for the Spanish flu at Walter Reed Military Hospital, in Washington, D.C. Credit: origins.osu.edu

This year marks the 100th anniversary of the great influenza pandemic of 1918. Between 50 and 100 million people are thought to have died, representing as much as 5 percent of the world’s population. Half a billion people were infected.

Especially remarkable was the 1918 flu’s predilection for taking the lives of otherwise healthy young adults, as opposed to children and the elderly, who usually suffer most. Some have called it the greatest pandemic in history.

The 1918 flu pandemic has been a regular subject of speculation over the last century. Historians and scientists have advanced numerous hypotheses regarding its origin, spread and consequences. As a result, many of us harbor misconceptions about it.

By correcting these 10 myths, we can better understand what actually happened and learn how to prevent and mitigate such disasters in the future.

1. The pandemic originated in Spain

No one believes the so-called “Spanish flu” originated in Spain.

The pandemic likely acquired this nickname because of World War I, which was in full swing at the time. The major countries involved in the war were keen to avoid encouraging their enemies, so reports of the extent of the flu were suppressed in Germany, Austria, France, the United Kingdom and the U.S. By contrast, neutral Spain had no need to keep the flu under wraps. That created the false impression that Spain was bearing the brunt of the disease.

In fact, the geographic origin of the flu is debated to this day, though hypotheses have suggested East Asia, Europe and even Kansas.

2. The pandemic was the work of a ‘super-virus’

The 1918 flu spread rapidly, killing 25 million people in just the first six months. This led some to fear the end of mankind, and has long fueled the supposition that the strain of influenza was particularly lethal.

However, more recent study suggests that the virus itself, though more lethal than other strains, was not fundamentally different from those that caused epidemics in other years.

Much of the high death rate can be attributed to crowding in military camps and urban environments, as well as poor nutrition and sanitation, which suffered during wartime. It’s now thought that many of the deaths were due to the development of bacterial pneumonias in lungs weakened by influenza.

3. The first wave of the pandemic was most lethal

Actually, the initial wave of deaths from the pandemic in the first half of 1918 was relatively low.

It was in the second wave, from October through December of that year, that the highest death rates were observed. A third wave in spring of 1919 was more lethal than the first but less so than the second.

Scientists now believe that the marked increase in deaths in the second wave was caused by conditions that favored the spread of a deadlier strain. People with mild cases stayed home, but those with severe cases were often crowded together in hospitals and camps, increasing transmission of a more lethal form of the virus.

4. The virus killed most people who were infected with it

In fact, the vast majority of the people who contracted the 1918 flu survived. National death rates among the infected generally did not exceed 20 percent.

However, death rates varied among different groups. In the U.S., deaths were particularly high among Native American populations, perhaps due to lower rates of exposure to past strains of influenza. In some cases, entire Native communities were wiped out.

Of course, even a 20 percent death rate vastly exceeds a typical flu, which kills less than one percent of those infected.

5. Therapies of the day had little impact on the disease

No specific anti-viral therapies were available during the 1918 flu. That’s still largely true today, where most medical care for the flu aims to support patients, rather than cure them.

One hypothesis suggests that many flu deaths could actually be attributed to aspirin poisoning. Medical authorities at the time recommended large doses of aspirin of up to 30 grams per day. Today, about four grams would be considered the maximum safe daily dose. Large doses of aspirin can lead to many of the pandemic’s symptoms, including bleeding.

However, death rates seem to have been equally high in some places in the world where aspirin was not so readily available, so the debate continues.

6. The pandemic dominated the day’s news

Public health officials, law enforcement officers and politicians had reasons to underplay the severity of the 1918 flu, which resulted in less coverage in the press. In addition to the fear that full disclosure might embolden enemies during wartime, they wanted to preserve public order and avoid panic.

However, officials did respond. At the height of the pandemic, quarantines were instituted in many cities. Some were forced to restrict essential services, including police and fire.

7. The pandemic changed the course of World War I

It’s unlikely that the flu changed the outcome of World War I, because combatants on both sides of the battlefield were relatively equally affected.

However, there is little doubt that the war profoundly influenced the course of the pandemic. Concentrating millions of troops created ideal circumstances for the development of more aggressive strains of the virus and its spread around the globe.

8. Widespread immunization ended the pandemic

Immunization against the flu as we know it today was not practiced in 1918, and thus played no role in ending the pandemic.

Exposure to prior strains of the flu may have offered some protection. For example, soldiers who had served in the military for years suffered lower rates of death than new recruits.

In addition, the rapidly mutating virus likely evolved over time into less lethal strains. This is predicted by models of natural selection. Because highly lethal strains kill their host rapidly, they cannot spread as easily as less lethal strains.

9. The genes of the virus have never been sequenced

In 2005, researchers announced that they had successfully determined the gene sequence of the 1918 influenza virus. The virus was recovered from the body of a flu victim buried in the permafrost of Alaska, as well as from samples of American soldiers who fell ill at the time.

Two years later, monkeys infected with the virus were found to exhibit the symptoms observed during the pandemic. Studies suggest that the monkeys died when their immune systems overreacted to the virus, a so-called “cytokine storm.” Scientists now believe that a similar immune system overreaction contributed to high death rates among otherwise healthy young adults in 1918.

10. The 1918 pandemic offers few lessons for 2018

Severe influenza epidemics tend to occur every few decades. Experts believe that the next one is a question not of “if” but “when.”

While few living people can recall the great flu pandemic of 1918, we can continue to learn its lessons, which range from the commonsense value of handwashing and immunizations to the potential of anti-viral drugs. Today we know more about how to isolate and handle large numbers of ill and dying patients, and we can prescribe antibiotics, not available in 1918, to combat secondary bacterial infections. Perhaps the best hope lies in improving nutrition, sanitation and standards of living, which render patients better able to resist the infection.

For the foreseeable future, flu epidemics will remain an annual feature of the rhythm of human life. As a society, we can only hope that we have learned the great pandemic’s lessons sufficiently well to quell another such worldwide catastrophe.


Explore further:
The mystery of a 1918 veteran and the flu pandemic

Provided by:
The Conversation

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles