Breaking News
February 20, 2018 - Booze Beats Pot at Being Unhealthy: Oregon Poll
February 20, 2018 - Morning Break: ’20 Years Late’; Drugs in the Dirt; Catching Flu in the Dorm
February 20, 2018 - Another piece to the puzzle in naked mole rats’ long, cancer-free life
February 20, 2018 - Scientists identify four viruses that can produce insulin-like hormones
February 20, 2018 - New e-Health solution developed to prevent cardiovascular disease, dementia in senior citizens
February 20, 2018 - New genetic risk score could help guide screening decisions for prostate cancer
February 20, 2018 - Study finds higher risk of stroke among blacks with atrial fibrillation than whites
February 20, 2018 - Physical activity could be used as strategy for diabetes prevention
February 20, 2018 - Researchers develop sensing method for early detection of cancer and diabetes
February 20, 2018 - New wearable electronics could be game-changer for stroke rehabilitation
February 20, 2018 - Immune history influences person’s response to flu vaccine
February 20, 2018 - Serenity Now! Learn to Have Patience with Patients
February 20, 2018 - Computer simulation addresses the problem of blood clotting
February 20, 2018 - Persistent bloating can be a sign of ovarian cancer, warns charity
February 20, 2018 - Key protein involved in epigenetic regulation of gene expression guides skin cell renewal
February 20, 2018 - Heart attack symptoms often missed in women
February 20, 2018 - Diagnosis of celiac disease takes 3.5 years for patients who do not report GI symptoms
February 20, 2018 - Study reveals functional dynamics of ion channels
February 20, 2018 - Study explores link between mortality risk and combustible tobacco use
February 20, 2018 - ‘She Trusted Me, and I’d Turned Her Away’
February 20, 2018 - AbbVie and Voyager Therapeutics collaborate to develop new treatments for tauopathies
February 20, 2018 - Fast food makes the immune system more aggressive in the long term
February 20, 2018 - Therapeutic target for glaucoma could have treatment ramifications for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s
February 20, 2018 - Overcoming Negative Reviews | Medpage Today
February 20, 2018 - MyD88—villain of allergies and asthma
February 20, 2018 - Food scientists develop rapid screening technique to detect pesticide residue in vegetables
February 20, 2018 - Lab-grown cerebellar cells may help explain how ASD develops at molecular level
February 20, 2018 - Scientists explore connection between bad sleep habits and stiff blood vessels
February 20, 2018 - New Treatment Apalutamide (Erleada) Approved for Prostate Cancer That Resists Hormone Therapy
February 20, 2018 - Do You Really Need My Signature on That?
February 20, 2018 - HIV-1 genetic diversity is higher in vaginal tract than in blood during early infection
February 20, 2018 - Diabetes does not increase work-loss years due to early retirement
February 20, 2018 - Researchers aim to find out how PTSD affects decisions of police
February 20, 2018 - UH Cleveland Medical Center explores novel treatments for uterine fibroids
February 20, 2018 - Flu Vax Efficacy 25% Against Predominant H3N2 Strain So Far
February 20, 2018 - HIV screening most optimal at 25 years of age if no risk factors
February 20, 2018 - Loyola Medicine primary care physician offers advice to minimize risk of flu
February 20, 2018 - Safe sleep recommendations for parents that may help reduce child’s risk of SUID
February 20, 2018 - Why Do So Few Docs Have Buprenorphine Waivers?
February 20, 2018 - Low levels of alcohol good for the brain
February 20, 2018 - Experimental treatment improves invisible symptoms of a man with spinal cord injury
February 20, 2018 - Myriad’s EndoPredict offers better prediction of breast cancer recurrence, analysis shows
February 20, 2018 - Researchers identify fifteen genes that determine our facial features
February 20, 2018 - Morning Break: New Health IT Player; Luxturna No Bargain; Nuclear Freakout
February 20, 2018 - How does it compare? Hospice care at home, at assisted living facility, at nursing home
February 19, 2018 - Scientists develop water-soluble warped nanographene for bioimaging
February 19, 2018 - It’s Not Your Imagination: You’re Hungrier After Losing Weight
February 19, 2018 - Antihypertensive Use At Delivery Rising in Preeclampsia
February 19, 2018 - A centuries-old math equation used to solve a modern-day genetics challenge
February 19, 2018 - Liquid biopsies could be used as new predictive marker for metastatic TNBC
February 19, 2018 - Russian researchers develop new multi-layered biodegradable scaffolds
February 19, 2018 - Are ‘Vaccine Skeptics’ Responsible for Flu Deaths?
February 19, 2018 - Hidden genetic effects behind immune diseases may be missed, study suggests
February 19, 2018 - Emergency nurses experience regular verbal and physical abuse
February 19, 2018 - Study sheds light on biology that guides behavior across different stages of life
February 19, 2018 - Morning Break: Transgender Breast Feeding; Brazilian ‘Pro-Vaxxers’; Post-Stroke Exercise
February 19, 2018 - Meningitis vaccination strategy in Africa found to be effective, economical
February 19, 2018 - Researchers uncover how excess calcium may influence development of Parkinson’s disease
February 19, 2018 - Psoriasis drug also effective at reducing aortic inflammation
February 19, 2018 - Excess emissions can make serious contributions to air pollution, study shows
February 19, 2018 - Researchers reveal potential biological roots behind individuality
February 19, 2018 - Diabetes Drugs Differ on HF; School-Based Obesity Program Flop; Plaque Type in ACS
February 19, 2018 - Surgical infections linked to drug-resistant bugs, study suggests
February 19, 2018 - Poor awareness may hinder a child’s early dental care
February 19, 2018 - Research finds rising trend in incidence of merkel cell carcinoma
February 19, 2018 - Researchers uncover Ras protein’s role in uncontrolled cancer growth
February 19, 2018 - FDA Approves Apalutamide (Erleada) to Help Curb a Tough-to-Treat Prostate Cancer
February 19, 2018 - Educational Tool Boosts Cervical Length Screening
February 19, 2018 - Spider’s web inspires removable implant that may control type 1 diabetes
February 19, 2018 - Scientists develop fluorescent probe to identify cancer stem cells
February 19, 2018 - University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela participates in large pancreatic cancer study
February 19, 2018 - New blood test shows promise to revolutionize diagnosis of tick-borne diseases
February 19, 2018 - Report: Use, Not Price, Drives State Health Costs
February 19, 2018 - Emergency services crews often unprepared for diabetic crises
February 19, 2018 - Scientists in Sweden create DNA nanowires that offer hope for treatment of diseases
February 19, 2018 - ID Break: Clean Hands, Fewer Abx; $11 Million HIV Cure?; MenB Vax for Kids
February 19, 2018 - Patient exposure to X-rays depends on how dentists are paid
February 19, 2018 - Study reveals parents’ views toward children’s tanning bed use
February 19, 2018 - Shot may help reduce risk of shingles
February 19, 2018 - FDA approves first treatment to reduce risk of NSCLC progression
CT Scans Reduce Lung Cancer Deaths … But Among Whom?

CT Scans Reduce Lung Cancer Deaths … But Among Whom?

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print

The National Lung Cancer Screening Trial found that screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT scanning can reduce all cause mortality. But the question of who to screen is somewhat contentious, as two opposing articles in the Annals of Internal Medicine suggest. In this 150-Second analysis, F. Perry Wilson, MD, breaks down the subtle (and not so subtle) ways in which lung-cancer screening decisions are complicated.

The National Lung Cancer Screening Trial provided strong evidence that screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT scans can reduce deaths.

Since then, the inclusion criteria of that trial have entered into national guidelines regarding who should get screened. And here are those guidelines:

  • Individuals aged 55 to 80 years with a 30 pack-year history of smoking and less than 15 years of smoking abstinence

These criteria would capture around 7 million Americans. If we screened all of them, we’d save around 32,000 lives.

But a couple of new analyses, appearing in the Annals of Internal Medicine, raise some interesting questions. We’ll tackle them in order.

First — are these criteria too simple? We have a number of statistical models that can quite accurately predict lung cancer risk. Why not just screen the highest risk people?

In an analysis using data from a representative health survey, Li Cheung and colleagues found that there is a substantial population of individuals at relatively high risk of lung cancer who wouldn’t fit under the current guideline’s umbrella. Here’s the risk for a hypothetical 60-year-old with a 25 pack-year history, but also with emphysema and a family history of lung cancer under various models.

The authors found that screening individuals with greater than a 2.5% risk of lung cancer over five years would save a bit more than 5000 additional lives.

But risk-based screening has some drawbacks. In a second article in the same Annals issue, David Kent and colleagues point out that risk-based screening is complicated – it requires a practitioner plugging a bunch of numbers into a computer program to get a risk score out at the end. We can do that – we do it for things like breast cancer – but it’s an added hurdle.

The other issue they bring up is that the benefit of saving one life in a higher-risk group is not the same as saving one life in a lower-risk group. It sounds cold, but people at high-risk of lung cancer are at high risk of a lot of things, and tend to have a reduced self-reported quality of life. In other words – catching an early lung cancer in a high-risk individual might not provide as much bang for the buck as catching one in a low-risk individual.

In the end, Kent’s group finds that screening high-risk individuals is a bit more cost-effective in terms of quality-adjusted life-years saved, but not drastically so. Screening low-risk people costs around $75,000 per quality-adjusted life-year saved, compared to $53,000 for screening high-risk individuals. These are both below the $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year threshold that many payers consider … well … worth it.

The conclusion? Screening based on the simple guidelines is probably fine.

But honestly the biggest question to me is: why are our screening rates so low? Of the 7 million eligible individuals, just 74,000 (about 1%) got screened last year. Maybe the question isn’t what model we should be using to decide who to screen, but how we should convince doctors and patients that screening is actually a good idea.

F. Perry Wilson, MD, MSCE, is an assistant professor of medicine at the Yale School of Medicine. He is a MedPage Today reviewer, and in addition to his video analyses, he authors a blog, The Methods Man. You can follow @methodsmanmd on Twitter.

2018-01-02T15:30:00-0500

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles