Breaking News
July 18, 2018 - Report warns of dog illness that can spread to owners
July 18, 2018 - A winning essayist’s tips for keeping track of scientific facts
July 18, 2018 - Researchers seek to understand role of APOE mutation in Alzheimer’s disease
July 18, 2018 - Animal studies reveal brain changes responsible for appetite effects of cannabis
July 18, 2018 - New ZEISS ZEN Intellesis machine allows segmentation of correlative microscopy
July 18, 2018 - Study findings highlight importance of early detection of SMA through newborn screening
July 18, 2018 - Results of Phase III (PIX306) Trial Evaluating Progression-Free Survival of Pixuvri (pixantrone) Combined with Rituximab in Patients with Aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
July 18, 2018 - Diabetes researchers find switch for fatty liver disease
July 18, 2018 - The future of the microbiome: A conversation
July 18, 2018 - States attacking ACA would hurt most if shield on preexisting conditions were axed
July 18, 2018 - Novel delivery system for bacteriophages could offer new way to battle lung infections
July 18, 2018 - PTSD may increase risk of stroke, heart attack in World Trade Center response crews
July 18, 2018 - Finding the right protective eyewear for young athletes
July 18, 2018 - Routine screening, treatment could help stem nationwide opioid epidemic
July 17, 2018 - AI and radar technologies could help diabetics manage their disease
July 17, 2018 - New Stanford algorithm could improve diagnosis of many rare genetic diseases
July 17, 2018 - Burdensome symptoms of eczema can lead to impaired quality of life, shows study
July 17, 2018 - Sartorius Stedim Biotech and Penn State partner to advance teaching, research in biotechnology
July 17, 2018 - Researchers map family trees of cancer cells to understand how AML responds to new drug
July 17, 2018 - Mortality from heart failure remains higher in women than men
July 17, 2018 - Can-Fite BioPharma receives Australian and Chinese patents for new drug to treat erectile dysfunction
July 17, 2018 - AAP: Lawnmowers Pose Serious Injury Risk to Children
July 17, 2018 - Fewer U.S. kids are getting cavities
July 17, 2018 - Differences in brain’s reward circuit may explain social deficits in autism
July 17, 2018 - YCC researchers suggest promising treatment for two rare inherited cancer syndromes
July 17, 2018 - FAU and partners receive NIH research grant to shed light on sleep loss and metabolic disorders
July 17, 2018 - Advanced MRI technique predicts risk of disease progression in MS
July 17, 2018 - Health Tip: Microwave Safely – Drugs.com MedNews
July 17, 2018 - New target for treating heart failure identified
July 17, 2018 - Biodesign fellows simplify heart rhythm monitoring
July 17, 2018 - Study reveals new risk genes for allergic rhinitis
July 17, 2018 - Community college education can increase physician diversity and access to primary care
July 17, 2018 - Inflection Biosciences’ dual mechanism inhibitor shows promise as treatment for CLL
July 17, 2018 - Researchers uncover how cells invite corrupted proteins inside
July 17, 2018 - Large international study finds new risk genes for hay fever
July 17, 2018 - Studies show HORIBA’s new hematology analyzer improves POCT and care of oncology patients
July 17, 2018 - New website aims to make yoga safer for everyone
July 17, 2018 - Long-term survival worse for black survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest
July 17, 2018 - Stanford data analyst’s childhood inspires his research: A Q&A
July 17, 2018 - Preventability of hospital readmissions changes over time, study reveals
July 17, 2018 - Nursing notes can help predict if ICU patients will survive
July 17, 2018 - Most older adults with probable dementia found to be either undiagnosed or unaware of it
July 17, 2018 - Vallum receives FDA clearance to market PEEK spinal interbody fusion device
July 17, 2018 - Okayama University research could improve prognosis of diabetic kidney disease
July 17, 2018 - Researchers develop machine learning method to predict unknown gene functions of microbes
July 17, 2018 - Homogenous BTK occupancy assay used in tirabrutinib clinical studies
July 17, 2018 - Study identifies new genes linked to heart function and development
July 17, 2018 - NeuroTrauma Sciences and Henry Ford join hands to advance exosome technology
July 17, 2018 - Improved methods to measure enterococci concentrations in recreational water
July 17, 2018 - White adolescent boys experiencing early puberty have high risk for substance use
July 17, 2018 - Celgene and Acceleron Announce Luspatercept Achieved Primary and All Key Secondary Endpoints in Phase III ‘BELIEVE’ Study in Adults with Transfusion-Dependent Beta-Thalassemia
July 17, 2018 - Roots of leukemia reveal possibility of predicting people at risk
July 17, 2018 - Summer med program embraces low-income students’ potential
July 17, 2018 - New research lays foundation to create standards for RNA sequencing
July 17, 2018 - CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing can cause greater genetic damage than previously thought
July 17, 2018 - Democrats rally against threats to the ACA to block Trump’s Supreme Court nominee
July 17, 2018 - Staggering prices slow insurers’ coverage of CAR-T cancer therapy
July 17, 2018 - How proteins involved in neurodegeneration enter cells
July 17, 2018 - New super-resolution ‘nanoscope’ provides insight into progression of Alzheimer’s disease
July 17, 2018 - FDA Advisory Committee Endorses the Effectiveness and Safety of Single-Dose Tafenoquine for the Radical Cure of P. vivax Malaria
July 17, 2018 - Uncovering the evolutionary history of IBD-associated colorectal cancer
July 17, 2018 - Is nutrition research dependable? Stanford’s John Ioannidis weighs in
July 17, 2018 - New machine learning framework predicts effects of genetic mutations in ‘dark matter’ regions
July 17, 2018 - Plant-based products fail to have positive impact on blood pressure during clinical studies
July 17, 2018 - Electronic system to speed up facial pain diagnosis may improve quality of life and save money
July 17, 2018 - Study delves into the role played by Protein Kinase C in synaptic plasticity
July 17, 2018 - Women Often Unaware of Their Hospital’s Religious Affiliation
July 17, 2018 - New AASM guideline recommends use of actigraphy for sleep disorders
July 17, 2018 - CRISPR editing reduces repetitive behavior in mice with a form of autism
July 17, 2018 - Scientists use magnets to detect cancer
July 17, 2018 - Microfluidic chip to detect sepsis proves successful in clinical study
July 17, 2018 - Research provides better understanding of mechanisms underlying memory storage
July 17, 2018 - A Multi-Modal Approach for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer
July 17, 2018 - Mailing colorectal cancer tests to patients increases screening rates, report researchers
July 17, 2018 - Scientists find possible sources of medicinal and antimicrobial drugs
July 17, 2018 - Molecules formed when the body metabolizes omega-3 fatty acids may inhibit cancer
July 17, 2018 - Efficient communication between hospitals improves patient safety and reduces mortality
July 17, 2018 - Study highlights potential of fetal gene therapy to prevent lethal neurodegenerative disease
July 17, 2018 - For Americans, in Science They Trust
July 17, 2018 - Combating HIV/AIDS | NIH MedlinePlus the Magazine
Research misconduct allegations shadow likely CDC appointee

Research misconduct allegations shadow likely CDC appointee

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print

A more than 20-year-old controversy over shoddy HIV research is re-emerging as a significant criticism of President Donald Trump’s likely pick to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The Army in 1994 acknowledged accuracy issues with HIV vaccine research led by Dr. Robert Redfield, who is expected to head the CDC, but concluded at the time that the data errors did not constitute misconduct.

Yet one of the whistleblowers who first raised the matter to the Army told Kaiser Health News this week that he remains so troubled about Redfield’s handling of the vaccine research that he has decided to speak out publicly.

Redfield was principal investigator over clinical trials of a treatment vaccine at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. The research was conducted at a time when there was intense pressure to come up with a treatment for HIV/AIDS, which often killed patients within a matter of months.

“Either he was egregiously sloppy with data or it was fabricated,” said former Air Force Lt. Col. Craig Hendrix, a doctor who is now director of the division of clinical pharmacology at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. “It was somewhere on that spectrum, both of which were serious and raised questions about his trustworthiness.”

In a letter to Trump this week, Washington Sen. Patty Murray, the ranking Democrat on the health committee, cited the research controversy as an example of a “pattern of ethically and morally questionable behavior” by Redfield that should prompt the president to reconsider the appointment.

Redfield’s appointment, which does not require Senate confirmation, was leaked to the news media over the weekend. Redfield did not respond to questions, and the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the CDC, declined to comment.

Redfield, who denied any scientific misconduct at the time, is now an HIV/AIDS expert at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. He has been praised by his supporters for his care of patients. He oversees a clinical program that treats 6,000 patients in the Baltimore-Washington area, according to an online bio.

But Redfield’s critics said the expected appointment demonstrates that the Trump administration is not vetting appointees thoroughly. The first CDC head, Brenda Fitzgerald, stepped down in January after a controversy over her purchase of tobacco stocks, and former HHS Secretary Tom Price resigned late last year amid criticism over his use of government and private planes for official travel.

“The White House claimed they would do better background checks,” said Dr. Sidney Wolfe, founder and senior adviser of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group. “But that statement is dangerously laughable. If they had done a proper background check, they wouldn’t have chosen Dr. Redfield.”

Public Citizen, a Washington watchdog group, was a leading critic of the Army’s handling of Redfield’s data at the time and obtained and published documents that detailed the controversy.

Hendrix, who was the director of an Air Force HIV clinical unit when he raised the concerns, said: “Two members of his [Redfield’s] team told me they had tried to replicate the analysis, but they couldn’t. When they tried to go to the Army, they said they were ignored.”

After Hendrix couldn’t replicate the results, he drafted a letter to his superiors reporting the data problems.

Hendrix said Redfield’s superiors initially told him not to send a letter detailing the concerns. Instead, the military scheduled a meeting with Redfield and other researchers so Hendrix could discuss the concerns. In the meeting, Hendrix recalled, Redfield acknowledged he had overstated how promising the results were.

“I thought it was resolved,” said Hendrix, who said he later called Redfield to say he was proud to work in an organization that could openly discuss such concerns.

However, Hendrix soon heard Redfield make the same inaccurate representations of the data at a conference and decided to file an official complaint requesting an investigation into scientific misconduct.

An Air Force institutional review board also recommended that the Army launch an inquiry stating: “The committee agreed the information presented by Dr. Redfield seriously threatens his credibility as a researcher and has the potential to negatively impact AIDS research funding for military institutions as a whole.”

But the Army did not appear to launch a full investigation, said Hendrix, who was interviewed at the time by the military official who conducted the inquiry. The military official declined Hendrix’s attempts to provide documented evidence, telling him the investigation was “informal.”

Hendrix later asked the commander of his hospital about the outcome of the investigation. He recalled that the commander called another officer to ask.

“I just remember him saying “Yes, sir,” he said. “When he hung up, he told me, ‘We will not be discussing this again.'”

Redfield was transferred from the laboratory he headed and assigned to treat patients, although the Army said he was not being punished. The Army also said the data would be corrected, and the military scrapped the program.

The project had earlier drawn criticism because Congress had set aside $20 million for the vaccine after lobbying by a former senator on behalf of the manufacturer.

Hendrix said he occasionally interacted over the years with Redfield and holds no grudges.

“Before this happened, he made important contributions to HIV-prevention efforts,” he said. “I respected him.”

However, he said, he remains disturbed by the military’s handling of the matter. He teaches a class on medical ethics and uses his own experience without naming Redfield to describe to his students the ethical quandaries faced in research.

Faulty data can lead other scientists to repeat the same mistakes and prompt participants to seek out trials for drugs and vaccines that don’t work.

“It’s a huge waste of funds,” he said. “But just as importantly, it diminishes trust, which is essential in science. If truth is eroded, then the whole enterprise falls apart.”

Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles