Breaking News
November 16, 2018 - Conditions that produce signs similar to arthritis
November 16, 2018 - AHA: Dapagliflozin Noninferior to Placebo for MACE in T2DM
November 16, 2018 - Surgery remains best treatment for appendicitis, Stanford study finds
November 16, 2018 - Researchers find no link between ‘allergy friendly’ dogs and lower risk of asthma
November 16, 2018 - Researchers elucidate new rules of connectivity of neurons in the neocortex
November 16, 2018 - Treating children with ‘bubble baby disease’
November 16, 2018 - Researchers find metabolite shuttle between cells in the liver that may combat tissue fibrosis
November 16, 2018 - AHA: PTSD Common Among Those Who Suffer Tear in the Aorta’s Wall
November 16, 2018 - Many RA patients’ pain related to central nervous system
November 16, 2018 - Changes in Himalayan gut microbiomes linked to diet
November 16, 2018 - Inhibition of prostaglandin E2 enhances ability to combat infectious colitis
November 16, 2018 - Chronic dry eye can slow reading rate and disrupt day to day tasks
November 16, 2018 - Researchers develop new drug molecule that inhibits inflammation
November 16, 2018 - Dementia symptoms peak in winter and spring, study finds
November 16, 2018 - Stanford tobacco researcher weighs in on JUUL
November 16, 2018 - Increasing omega-3 fatty acid intake during pregnancy reduces risk of premature birth, review finds
November 16, 2018 - Researchers find no link between infants waking up at night and later developmental problems
November 16, 2018 - Both parents and children agree about confidential medical services
November 16, 2018 - FDA warns against use of unapproved pain medications with implanted pumps
November 16, 2018 - Precision medicine-based approach to slow or reverse biologic drivers of Alzheimer’s disease
November 16, 2018 - Study provides new insight into norovirus outbreaks, may help guide efforts to develop vaccines
November 16, 2018 - Inexpensive, portable air purifier could help protect the heart from pollution
November 16, 2018 - New 15-minute scan could help diagnose brain damage in babies up to two years old
November 16, 2018 - Deep brain stimulation not effective for treating early Alzheimer’s
November 16, 2018 - Traditional chemotherapy superior to new alternative for oropharyngeal cancers | News Center
November 16, 2018 - What This Pond Protist Does With Its Genome Will Astound You
November 15, 2018 - Researchers develop tool that speeds up analysis and publication of biomedical data
November 15, 2018 - Scientists identify mechanism used by lung cancer cells to obtain glucose
November 15, 2018 - Abnormalities in development of the brain could be involved in onset of autism, finds new study
November 15, 2018 - Soy protein equally effective as animal protein in building muscle strength
November 15, 2018 - American Academy of Pediatrics, Nov. 2-6
November 15, 2018 - Dopamine drives early addiction to heroin
November 15, 2018 - Variance in gut microbiome in Himalayan populations linked to dietary lifestyle | News Center
November 15, 2018 - Reducing Cardiovascular Disease: The Amish Way
November 15, 2018 - King’s researchers launch charter to guide organizations to engage abuse survivors in research
November 15, 2018 - Enable Injections enters into development agreements with UCB and Apellis Pharmaceuticals
November 15, 2018 - TGen North collaborates with NARBHA Institute to advance human health
November 15, 2018 - Researchers discover molecular basis for therapeutic actions of an African folk medicine
November 15, 2018 - Human Cell Atlas study of early pregnancy shows how mother’s immune system is modified
November 15, 2018 - New guidelines for detecting and managing sarcopenia to be launched in the UK
November 15, 2018 - Researchers explore role of dietary composition on energy expenditure
November 15, 2018 - Elsevier launches Entellect™ Platform, unlocking value by creating AI-ready life sciences data
November 15, 2018 - Now that cannabis is legal in Canada, let’s use it to tackle the opioid crisis
November 15, 2018 - In the Spotlight: At the intersection of tech, health, and ethics
November 15, 2018 - Traditional Glaucoma Test Can Miss Severity of the Disease
November 15, 2018 - Researchers directly connect activities of genes with instinctive behavior in male cichlids
November 15, 2018 - Salk researchers report new methods to identify AD drug candidates with anti-aging properties
November 15, 2018 - St. Jude Hospital announces availability of largest collections of leukemia samples
November 15, 2018 - Attenua Announces First Patient Treated in Phase 2 Clinical Trial in Chronic Cough with Bradanicline
November 15, 2018 - Designing a novel cell-permeable peptide chimera to promote wound healing
November 15, 2018 - NEI investigators combine two imaging modalities to view the retina in unprecedented detail
November 15, 2018 - Determining how hearts develop to better understand congenital heart defects
November 15, 2018 - Maverick immune cells can act independently to identify and kill cancer cells, finds research
November 15, 2018 - Advanced AI and big data methods to tackle dementia
November 15, 2018 - Report reveals increase in pancreatic cancer death rates across Europe
November 15, 2018 - Luxia Scientific announces availability of its gut microbiome test in Luxembourg
November 15, 2018 - New diabetes drugs linked to increased risk of lower-limb amputation and ketoacidosis
November 15, 2018 - New approach targets matrix surrounding neurons to protect neurons after stroke
November 15, 2018 - Lilly Submits New Drug Application to the FDA for Lasmiditan for Acute Treatment of Migraine
November 15, 2018 - Heart failure patients shouldn’t stop meds even if condition improves: study
November 15, 2018 - Parents and carers of people with diabetes experience emotional or mental health problems
November 15, 2018 - RetiPharma secures funding to develop new peptide drug for treating degenerative eye disorders
November 15, 2018 - Breakthrough research could lead to a new wave of cancer-fighting antibodies
November 15, 2018 - Mylan and Biocon launch new insulin glargine biosimilar in the UK
November 15, 2018 - For wildfire safety, only particular masks guard against toxic particulate matter
November 15, 2018 - New study of tribe shows influence of Western diet and lifestyle on blood pressure
November 15, 2018 - Scientists harness power of natural killer cells to treat children with neuroblastoma
November 15, 2018 - Investigating foodborne disease outbreak in Bosnia and Herzegovina based on simulation game
November 15, 2018 - Recommendations Issued for Management of Bradycardia
November 15, 2018 - Benefit unclear due to a lack of suitable studies
November 15, 2018 - TAMEST recognizes UT Southwestern’s Ralph DeBerardinis for changing our understanding of cancer
November 15, 2018 - Researchers discover key factors behind intestinal inflammation in CVID patients
November 15, 2018 - CityU develops first microarrayed 3D neuronal culture platform
November 15, 2018 - Expert suggests ways to control uncomfortable vaginal symptoms in diabetic women
November 15, 2018 - New edition of Red Journal focuses on roles of imaging in radiation oncology
November 15, 2018 - Doctors Aren’t Promoting Breastfeeding’s Cancer-Protection Benefit
November 15, 2018 - Collection of demonstration projects highlights value of patient engagement in research
November 15, 2018 - Technique to ‘listen’ to a patient’s brain during tumour surgery
November 15, 2018 - Seven-year-old returns to life as a “normal, healthy child” following bone marrow transplant
November 15, 2018 - AMSBIO expands range of high quality FFPE cancer cell line controls
Legal scholars sound alarm on academies’ report about returning research results to participants

Legal scholars sound alarm on academies’ report about returning research results to participants

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print

In a Policy Forum article appearing in the Oct. 12 issue of Science, leading bioethics and legal scholars sound the alarm about a recent report from National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. The Academies’ report on “Returning Individual Research Results to Participants” makes recommendations on how to share research results and data with people who agree to participate in research studies and calls for problematic changes to federal law. This report proclaims its support for research participants’ rights but, in reality, creates major new roadblocks to the return of data and results to participants and would roll back important privacy protections people have under current law, according to the analysis in the new Science article.

The article’s authors, Susan M. Wolf and Barbara J. Evans, collaborated as part of the “LawSeqSM: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application” project funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute and National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Wolf is the McKnight Presidential Professor of Law, Medicine & Public Policy; Faegre Baker Daniels Professor of Law; and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota and is Chair of the University’s Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences. Evans is the Mary Ann and Lawrence E. Faust Professor of Law, Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Director of the Center for Biotechnology & Law at the University of Houston.

“Researchers conducting imaging, environmental health, and genetics studies have offered participants their research findings for years,” Wolf and Evans point out. Research participants value access to their results for a wide range of reasons, including protecting their health, and evaluating the privacy risks posed by circulation of their data. People value access to results even when the results are still under study and may be uncertain. Over the past 20 years, researchers have developed pathways for returning results in situations where the results raise clinical concerns, such as suggesting that the person may have a medical condition that needs clinical follow-up evaluation. These pathways are ethically sound and protect the participants’ safety by ensuring compliance with necessary laws and regulations. Unfortunately, the Policy Forum article asserts, “the Academies’ report rejects this widely supported, legally sound approach” and instead recommends restrictions on access to research results and data.

Wolf and Evans write that, “Efforts to turn back the clock on return of results appear rooted in confusion about the law.” The Academies’ report incorporates incorrect statements about the federal CLIA legal framework, which aims to ensure the quality of laboratory tests conducted for health care purposes.

The report overstates the degree to which research laboratories can be regulated under the CLIA statute.

The Academies’ report also conflicts with existing federal privacy laws that protect research participants’ access to their own data. For more than 50 years, Congress has treated individual access to one’s own data as an essential element of personal privacy protection, as seen in the Privacy Act that protects data stored in governmental databases, the HIPAA Privacy Rule that protects Americans’ medical privacy, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act that expanded HIPAA’s protections to genetic information. Only by seeing the personal data collected can an individual assess the privacy risks involved. Yet the Academies’ report recommends that an individual’s access to their data be restricted to the subset of data that meets certain quality standards. Wolf and Evans explain how this would undermine federal privacy protections, which recognize that privacy can be put at risk even by low- quality data and data that is wrongly attributed to a person.

Finally, the Policy Forum article criticizes the Academies’ recommendation to load multiple decisions about return of results on Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). This would place “substantial new burdens on IRBs, despite extensive literature on the limits of IRB decision making.” The report “maximizes the burden on IRBs by mischaracterizing existing consensus guidelines and suggesting that IRBs start over.”

Wolf and Evans conclude, “The Academies’ report endorses the idea of participant access to results and data, but then builds daunting barriers. The report rejects established legal rights of access, two decades of consensus guidelines, and abundant data showing that participants benefit from access while incurring little risk. The report too often prefers paternalistic silence over partnership.”

“True progress on return of results requires accepting participants’ established rights of access and respecting the value that participants place on broad access to their data and results. The next step is not to build barriers but to promote transparency.”

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles