Breaking News
August 15, 2018 - Early Onset Type 1 Diabetes Linked to Heart Disease, Shorter Life
August 14, 2018 - SMURF1 provides targeted approach to preventing cocaine addiction relapse
August 14, 2018 - Genetic testing pushed for hereditary high cholesterol disease
August 14, 2018 - Researchers discover new genes involved in Alzheimer’s Disease
August 14, 2018 - Medicare to overhaul ACOs but critics fear fewer participants
August 14, 2018 - Adolescent health projects receive meager percentage of global funding, study finds
August 14, 2018 - University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center launches new CAR-T therapy trial
August 14, 2018 - In the addiction battle, is forced rehab the solution?
August 14, 2018 - Busting myths about milk – Scope
August 14, 2018 - Platelet-rich plasma does not enhance cartilage formation capabilities of stem cells
August 14, 2018 - Wearable devices and ‘mhealth’ technology emerge as promising tools for better health
August 14, 2018 - Phase 2 Clinical Data Published Showing Summit’s Ridinilazole Preserved Gut Microbiome of Patients with CDI
August 14, 2018 - Cardiac progenitor cells undergo a cell fate switch to build coronary arteries
August 14, 2018 - Study identifies potential guidance to treat gastric cancer patients
August 14, 2018 - Revealed: The molecular mechanism underlying hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or “workaholic heart”
August 14, 2018 - Diabetes epidemic in Guatemala driven by aging, not obesity
August 14, 2018 - New technology shows potential to streamline the analysis of proteins
August 14, 2018 - Rethinking the stroke rule ‘time is brain’
August 14, 2018 - Incidence of coronary artery compression in children may be more common than previously thought
August 14, 2018 - Study helps to better understand disease caused by Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
August 14, 2018 - AI platform identifies acute neurological illnesses faster than human diagnosis
August 14, 2018 - American College of Rheumatology receives grants to support development of lupus clinical trials
August 14, 2018 - New study explains why women get more migraines than men
August 14, 2018 - American Heart Association Urges Screen Time Limits for Youth
August 14, 2018 - Brief interventions during routine care reduce alcohol use among men with HIV
August 14, 2018 - New genome analysis could identify people at higher risk of common deadly diseases
August 14, 2018 - NIH grant for Mount Sinai to study use of inhaled corticosteroids for treatment of sickle cell disease
August 14, 2018 - Daicel supplies free nanodiamond samples to international researchers
August 14, 2018 - Switching anti-psychotic drugs in first-episode schizophrenia patients does not improve clinical outcomes
August 14, 2018 - Study to examine whether modulating gut bacteria can improve cardiac function in heart failure patients
August 14, 2018 - AI technology could hold key to improving health services
August 14, 2018 - One out of two children not getting enough nutrients needed for their health
August 14, 2018 - Mono-antiplatelet therapy after aortic heart valve replacements may work as well as two drugs
August 14, 2018 - Aid-in-dying patient chooses his last day
August 14, 2018 - Exercise Really Can Chase Away the Blues, to a Point
August 14, 2018 - Surgical mesh implants may cause autoimmune disorders
August 14, 2018 - Researchers develop revolutionary zebrafish model to gain more insight into bone diseases
August 14, 2018 - Researchers discover secret communication hotline between breast cancers and normal cells
August 14, 2018 - Study examines how a person adapts to visual field loss after stroke
August 14, 2018 - Researchers show how specialized nucleic acid-based nanostructures could help target cancer cells
August 14, 2018 - Reducing opioid prescriptions for one operation can also spill over to other procedures
August 14, 2018 - E-cigarettes not so safe but still better than cigarettes
August 14, 2018 - Researchers find link between common ‘harmless’ virus and cardiovascular damage
August 14, 2018 - Initiation of PIMs associated with higher risk of fracture-specific hospitalizations and mortality
August 14, 2018 - Genetically modified mosquitoes and special bed nets help tackle deadly diseases
August 14, 2018 - Advances in treating hep C lead to new option for transplant patients
August 14, 2018 - Study finds quality of doctor-patient discussions about lung cancer screening to be ‘poor’
August 14, 2018 - MSU researchers uncover the effects of aging on regenerative ability of kidneys
August 14, 2018 - Better conditioning, throwing mechanics can help reduce elbow injuries in young baseball pitchers
August 14, 2018 - Brain game doesn’t offer brain gain
August 14, 2018 - Reproductive choices facing women with disabilities require careful consideration
August 14, 2018 - Scientists pinpoint the cause of a rare childhood seizure disorder
August 14, 2018 - Lumpectomy plus radiation associated with reduced risk of breast cancer death, study finds
August 14, 2018 - UAB study shows how ion channel differentiates newborn and mature neurons in the brain
August 14, 2018 - Experts highlight key knowledge gaps that need to be addressed in Ebola vaccine research
August 14, 2018 - Discovery could lead to new drugs against infection and inflammation
August 14, 2018 - Infection Prevention Differs Between Small, Large Hospitals
August 14, 2018 - Mom still matters—In study, young adults tended to prioritize parents over friends
August 14, 2018 - Deep brain stimulation might benefit those with severe alcoholism, preliminary studies show
August 14, 2018 - Study finds increased rate of repeat pregnancies in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities
August 14, 2018 - Lighter sedation fails to reduce risk of postoperative delirium in older patients
August 13, 2018 - Asking better questions about person’s memory could improve doctors’ understanding of patients
August 13, 2018 - U.S. Trauma Doctors Push for Stricter Gun Controls
August 13, 2018 - Asthma and flu: a double whammy
August 13, 2018 - 5 Questions: Donna Zulman on engaging high-need patients in intensive outpatient programs | News Center
August 13, 2018 - Behavioral Nudges Lead to Drop in Prescriptions of Potent Antipsychotic
August 13, 2018 - Potential New Class of Drugs May Reduce Cardiovascular Risk by Targeting Gut Microbes
August 13, 2018 - How to get your kids to eat better
August 13, 2018 - The importance of hearing your patients
August 13, 2018 - Transmission of F. tularensis unlikely to happen through the food chain
August 13, 2018 - Researchers discover epigenetic mechanism underlying ischemic cardiomyopathy
August 13, 2018 - Adolescent health programs receive only a tiny share of international aid, finds research
August 13, 2018 - Fracture risk increases by 30% after gastric bypass, study shows
August 13, 2018 - Quality-improvement project to standardize feeding practices helps micro preemies gain weight
August 13, 2018 - Long-term cannabinoid exposure impairs memory, study shows
August 13, 2018 - New intervention to reduce risk of HIV in young transgender women
August 13, 2018 - Japan human trial tests iPS cell treatment for Parkinson’s
August 13, 2018 - Altered nitrogen metabolism may contribute to emergence of new cancer mutations
August 13, 2018 - Cycling provides greatest health benefits, study finds
August 13, 2018 - Scientists discover biomarker for kidney cancer
Are Researchers Who Work With Industry Always Evil?

Are Researchers Who Work With Industry Always Evil?

image_pdfDownload PDFimage_print

Last week, my post was entitled “Do Russians Always Cheat?” It was a piece delivered with sarcasm, but with a serious intent.

Its message: We have lost our ability to trust each other, and we need to fix it.

The response to the post was extraordinary, but sadly, some people thought that I was stereotyping Russians. They claimed I was lumping all Russians together rather than treating each person as an individual. This was really strange, because my post had nothing to do with Russia.

As I wrote in a comment: “To those who misinterpreted my reference to Russia, please allow me to make the record clear. In 1943, the Russia army liberated my parents from a Nazi-led forced labor camp in what is now known as Vilnius. The Russian people will forever have my undying gratitude in playing the central role in this miracle. If they had not done that, I would not be alive today.”

But this experience did get me to wonder about the phenomenon of stereotyping. Some people say that no one should ever engage in stereotyping. I agree.

But interestingly, on December 13, one reader who was displeased with my post provided the following comment: “I’m just curious what type of consultations the author gives to Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardiorentis, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novo Nordisk, Relypsa, Sanofi, Takeda, and ZS Pharma, etc …”

Another reader posted the comment: “Wonder who sponsored the article?”

Huh?

Let me see if I understand. Someone reads my disclosures and realizes that I am a clinical investigator who works with pharmaceutical companies to help them design and analyze clinical trials. Most of the time, I give advice that they do not necessarily like. This is my primary interaction with the pharmaceutical industry. I do not give presentations to physicians that are sponsored by industry about any drug or device.

The fact that certain companies seek my advice should not be particularly surprising. And it should not be surprising that I am compensated for my time and effort for providing my insights.

But somehow, this interaction seems to offend certain people. They assume that I am merely a pawn for the interests of the private sector.

Am I being stereotyped?

Yes, I am being stereotyped, and the people who are doing it are precisely those who generally condemn stereotyping when they see other people do it.

So I guess I have several options available to me.

First, I could stop interacting with industry. If my advice has any value to those designing clinical trials, that advice would no longer be available to them. If every consultant did that, then industry would be on its own — without any external input or guidance. That would be awful.

Second, I could work with industry and do it for free. But most people think it is appropriate to be compensated for one’s time and effort. Furthermore, in my experience, companies do not listen very well to guidance that they do not pay for. That is why people pay to go to psychotherapists for advice they could easily have received for free.

Third, I could work with industry and receive payment for doing so, but I could not disclose these relationships. That would be unbelievably unethical and stupid.

So I am transparent about my relationships with industry. In truth, I am quite pleased that there are people who value my expertise. I think that my interactions with industry have had a major positive impact on human health. And I am very happy to tell anyone about it who wants to know.

But doing so means that there will be people who look at my disclosures and assume that I am biased by my financial ties.

Everyone who knows me already knows that I express my opinions openly. I have criticized nearly every aspect of medicine and health care. I am allowed to have and express opinions of my own, even though I help to design clinical trials and am compensated for doing so.

But if you live in a dark cynical world, you are going to look at my disclosures and commit the atrocity of stereotyping. Some who are reading this right now are certainly inclined to do so.

That is unbelievably hypocritical.

And no one paid me to say so.

Packer recently consulted for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardiorentis, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novo Nordisk, Relypsa, Sanofi, Takeda, and ZS Pharma. He chairs the EMPEROR Executive Committee for trials of empagliflozin for the treatment of heart failure. He was previously the co-PI of the PARADIGM-HF trial and serves on the Steering Committee of the PARAGON-HF trial, but has no financial relationship with Novartis.

2017-12-20T10:30:00-0500

Tagged with:

About author

Related Articles